User talk:Angelo.romano: Difference between revisions
Delivering Signpost |
→Serie A 2008–09 Top Goalscorers: new section |
||
| Line 1,605: | Line 1,605: | ||
<small>Delivered by 03:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC) at <font color="green">[[User:ShepBot|'''§hepBot''']]</font>''' <small>(<font color="red">[[User talk:ShepBot|Disable]]</font>)'''</small></small> |
<small>Delivered by 03:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC) at <font color="green">[[User:ShepBot|'''§hepBot''']]</font>''' <small>(<font color="red">[[User talk:ShepBot|Disable]]</font>)'''</small></small> |
||
== [[Serie A 2008–09]] Top Goalscorers == |
|||
I've seen a lot of what you've done on the Wiki, and I have to commend you for all that. However, with all due respect, I don't think the [[Serie A 2008–09|page]] looks as good with that long list on there. While you may prefer it, it may not be the best option for the page and the rest of the community; that is why I replaced it with a shorter table. It still relays the information that's required (granted with the excessive entries removed), all while making the page cleaner and smaller. I've posted a discussion on the [[Talk:Serie A 2008–09#Top Goalscorers - Table vs List|Talk]] page expressing my full opinion and reasoning there, and I'd love to get your full opinion on the matter since the edit summary can only hold so much. I know it was very straightforward and simple, but I didn't want to start a revert war without attempting to discuss it first; I'm just looking for the best interests of the page and the community, and I just think the table would better suit it, despite the previous seasons all having a list (or at least a shorter list on the current page). --[[User:Snojoe|Snojoe]] ([[User talk:Snojoe|talk]]) 10:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:38, 29 January 2009
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Beliefs Sidebar
Hi Angelo, How did you add the beliefs sidebar to your profile, particularly the "This user wants Sicilian to be recognized as first and official language of his native country."? Thank you Sicilianu101 (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Sicilianu101
Template
I've temporarily solved it by moving the parameters around, though I don't know if this will be to the liking of the MLS people. However, it seems to have been caused by having parameters below the kits - if you have any idea how this might be fixed, have a play with {{Infobox Football club3}} and its effects on User:Number 57/Bury Town F.C.. Thanks for alerting me. пﮟოьεԻ 57 22:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Request for your help
Could you take a look at this (trivial) debate and close it up please, so that people can get on with building an encyclopaedia rather than bickering and edit warring over trivial issues like whether British clubs should have F.C. after their names in the infobox. All the best. English peasant 20:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to keep bothering you, I wonder if you could find any information on this player, he doesn't seem to have played for Estudiantes, and no longer plays for Treviso. Perhaps you could find out what happened to him, it's pretty misleading as is, (I couldn't find much about him in English or Spanish and my Italian isn't up to much). Regards English peasant 23:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- This suggests that he has played 24 times, but his lack of profile at Futbol XXI suggests that none of these games were with Estudiantes in the Argentine Primera, so it seems he's only ever played for Club El Porvenir, they may have been professional in 05-06 but I'm not sure the whole league was, this kind of information is not the kind of thing that is easily obtained, hence my WP:FOOTYN suggestion that notability should be determined on a club by club basis, with the emphasis on the protectionists to provide reliable proof. I'd AfD it, but its much better that the majority of the misleading junk that anti-deletionists have fought hard to keep, without doing anything to improve so it would probably get kept anyway. I just get sick of maintaining articles about such non-entities. Regards English peasant 19:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:AS Roma.png
Thanks for uploading Image:AS Roma.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Advice
I advice you regarding violation of user:DIREKTOR for this restriction. Always DIREKTOR persists in several edit wars pushing his POV statements. Articles involved:
- Republic of Ragusa
- Albania Veneta
- Dalmatian Italians
- Josip Broz Tito
- Foibe massacres
- Istrian exodus
- many others.
You can control history of these articles for evidence! Inoltre questo tizio manifesta un odio anti-italiano proprio offensivo e contrario alla policy: wikipedia:harassment. Ossequi e buona fortuna. Nemo, 1 May 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.67.84.15 (talk) 14:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Current squad and Navbox
Hi Angelo, I have been thinking about how frustrating it is to update player articles on wikipedia. The process takes a minimum of 5 steps to be done properly:
- Remove from old team Navbox
- Remove from old team current squad
- add to new Navbox
- add to new current squad
- Update player article
I have thought of an idea to make the process quicker for people like me who process hundreds of player transfers per transfer window.
The idea is to combine the functions of the current squad used on team articles and the navbox to make a template that can switch displays between something very similar to a current squad when you include something like club article=yes and as the navbox on player articles.
So the club article would have {{Argentinos Juniors current squad|club article=yes}} and the players would have {{Argentinos Juniors current squad}}. It would obviously be neccessary to put the [v] [d] [e] gubbins at the top of the club article template to make it easily editable.
The main benefit of this change would be to reduce the number of edits per transfer from 5 to 3, an additional benefit would be to make it impossible for the current squad and navbox getting out of sync, which is a constant problem in South American football articles.
I don't have the programming skills to design this thing, I hope you understand what I'm getting at and agree that this change would save a lot of editing time. Could you look into the possibility of doing this, I would be extremely grateful, and willing to do the edits necessary to roll these changes out for the Argentine Primera as a testing ground.
I raised this issue at Wikiproject football, where it got largely ignored, raised it with an experienced editor, who eventually tired of trying to work out how to do it. I am really hoping that you can help me with this, or at least point me in the direction of someone who can. Please let me know what you think, EP 00:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- I take it you mean you don't want to see further proliferation of navboxes on player articles for minor teams, in which case I fully agree. Could you have a think about how we could code the new template, I know it needs switch functions, and some way of making the navbox ignore the {{fs mid}}. Perhaps you could work on a prototype, (my efforts have been futile) then we can take it back to WP:FOOTY and discuss restricting the use of the new template to fully professional teams? All the best EP 16:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Protection
I am concerned about some of the pages you have protected recently. Initially my cocern was in relation to the John Terry article, which I feel is experiencing a fairly standard level of vandalism for a high-profile article (about 15-16 vandalism edits in the 8 hour between my unprotection and your re-protection). The discouraging effect on potential new contributors visiting Wikipedia to view the article, would seem to outweigh the small reduction in vandalism, which can be easily handled via the usual means. Having looked at your protection log, my greater concern is your protection of Juventus F.C., which you seem to have protected following a content dispute that you were involved with [1] [2]. The edits that you reverted do not seem to have been vandalism or to be otherwise disruptive, and there seems to instead be a disagreement between you and at least one other editor over when it would be appropriate to add Mellberg to the list. It this was a content dispute, then it would be highly inappropriate for you to use to protection to prevent the other party from editing. I would be keen to hear your thoughts on this. Best Regards TigerShark (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- I don't agree because it does not seem deliberate misinformation (as you also seem to claim that he will join the current squad), rather it seems to be a content/style disagreement over when such information should be added. I think it would be useful to get other opinions, so have raised the matter here. Thanks TigerShark (talk) 08:04, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'd really like to get some resolution on this, so a response would be appreciated. Could you clarify which of the Semi-protection criteria you are using to justify this protection? Thanks TigerShark (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will unprotect them for now, but I preferred to speak with you first, especially as we have both protected/unprotected John Terry so I didn't want you to think that I was reversing an action on one article in response to you reversing one of mine. The thing with the edits is that they don't actually seem to be adding inaccurate information, rather that they are adding it in a way that is not standard practice (i.e. adding players to the current squad before the July 1st deadline). Does that make any sense? Thanks for the response. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 15:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'd really like to get some resolution on this, so a response would be appreciated. Could you clarify which of the Semi-protection criteria you are using to justify this protection? Thanks TigerShark (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Conditions for Serie B Playoffs & Playouts
I thought the rules for potential Serie B Playoffs were as follows: a gap of 10 points or more between 3rd and 4th place and there are no playoffs, 9 points or less and we do have playoffs. Similarly, a gap of 5 points or more between 18th and 19th place and there are no playouts, 4 points or less and there will be playouts. Your edit on the Serie B 2007/08 page suggest new rules. I just want to confirm that new rules are in place. If so, the Serie B page should be updated as well. Juve2000 (talk) 14:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Inter signs Poli Timisoara midfielder Daminuţă
http://www.gsp.ro/stire/exclusiv-daminuta-la-inter-70821.html
OK man. I'm sorry for this problem... jjmihai (talk) @ 15:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Wikinews invitation
Would you like to come over to Wikinews to write soccer match reports? Kingjeff (talk) 01:45, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
could you please do me a favor?
Hello,
I am a master student at the Institute of Technology Management, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan. Currently I am wrapping up my master thesis titled “Can Wikipedia be used for knowledge service?” In order to validate the knowledge evolution maps of identified users in Wikipedia, I need your help. I have generated a knowledge evolution map to denote your knowledge activities in Wikipedia according to your inputs including the creation and modification of contents in Wikipedia, and I need you to validate whether the generated knowledge evolution map matches the knowledge that you perceive you own it. Could you please do me a favor?
- I will send you a URL link to a webpage on which your knowledge evolution map displays. Please assign the topic (concept) in the map to a certain cluster on the map according to the relationship between the topic and clusters in your cognition, or you can assign it to ‘none of above’ if there is no suitable cluster.
- I will also send a questionnaire to you. The questions are related to my research topic, and I need your viewpoints about these questions.
The deadline of my thesis defense is set by the end of June, 2008. There is no much time left for me to wrap up the thesis. If you can help me, please reply this message. I will send you the URL link of the first part once I receive your response. The completion of my thesis heavily relies much on your generous help.
Sincerely
JnWtalk 07:23, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Request for your help
Scusa se scrivo a te, ma non so dove sbattere la testa. Scusami anche se scrivo in italiano, ma il mio livello di inglese è troppo basso per spiegarti bene le cose che voglio spiegarti. Ho spedito un paio di contributi anonimi alla Wikipedia inglese e subito due utenti (li vedi nella mia talk page) hanno iniziato a dire che io sono un utente già bannato. Ogni mio intervento è stato da questi due cancellato, e solo dopo furibonde discussioni mi è stato permesso di lasciare un paio di cose che ho scritto. Però questi continuano a dire che io sono il clone di un altro, e poi di un altro, e infine id un altro ancora. Io mi sono presentato col mio vero nome e cognome, ho indicato anche una serie di cose che su di me si possono leggere in internet (sono uno storico dilettante, ricercatore presso un'associazione che si occupa della memoria della Shoah/Olocausto). Come posso fare perché questi due non mi diano più fastidio? Come funziona Wikipedia in questi casi? Io voglio che questi mi lascino in pace!!! Grazie per tutto quello che potrai fare.--Luigi 28 (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 24 | 9 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Jose Mourinho editor
Hi, i noticed this user was inserting football rumours and the like into the article. I agree these should be removed but the editor seems keen to improve wikipedia. Inexperienced users often make mistakes about what is appropriate in wikipedia, in fact i believe few of them realise wikipedia is actually an encyclopedia instead seeing it as just some website they've visited. While it is frustrating when people make disruptive edits maybe you should try telling them what they've done wrong and why (see the IPs talk page for my response). It often solves the problem and maybe we'll get a new editor of wikipedia; with much to offer. Still, the article should be locked as it's being vandalised frequently at the moment as i've seen from my watchlist. Thanks. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 18:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, i have to agree that it does make the article worse: it's current trivia masquerading as a valid part of wikipedia! I guess there will always be people putting this kind of material in. However, the editor I was talking about seemed to present the material very well (in spite the fact that it shouldn't be there) so they could eventually become a useful editor instead of a nuisance. I understand your pessimism though. The football articles seem to attract these kind of edits, and editors, more than other articles do. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 20:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Zeman's nationality
Hi. I couldn't find the guideline you were referring to at WP:FLAGS. Actually, it's only mentioned there that, if a person has recently emigrated, or if there is no evidence of gaining second citizenship, the use of flags should be avoided. Since Zeman has Italian citizenship since 1975, and has been living there since 1968, I really can't find a reason to omit Italian flag. It is relevant and it's definitely not overuse. Regards, --Vitriden (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- OK, but in that case, that's not a policy. I really don't know about Zeman's status in Italy, but in Serbia he was announced by the press as a Czech-Italian coach. And I think it is correct, since he has dual citizenship. But, I won't argue over something this trivial, so, if you think it's better to do it this way, it's fine by me.--Vitriden (talk) 15:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I know this is not your field of expertise but DreamBrother83 is uploading a large amount of images with false GNU labels. Can you do something about it? I've reverted the page to before the copyvio images were added and tagged many of the images but i can't keep up. Hope you can help. Thanks. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 18:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks very much. That was getting a bit messy. Sorry to bother you about it! Sillyfolkboy (talk) 18:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:InternazionaleBadge.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:InternazionaleBadge.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 25 | 23 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 26 | 26 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 27 | 30 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
What do you think about protecting this article for a while? It's being vandalised frequently as you can see by the history, somehow i think there will always be vandals for this particular article! Sillyfolkboy (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
List of Italian football transfers summer 2008
Sorry for my fault, but could you mind find the sources of the transfers i added yesterday, such as Reggina? And can you read the Lazio Annul report and add the transfer fees once the annual report/half-year report is released? Matthew_hk tc 05:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Luca Santononicto
May I ask why you deleted this page?This person does exist and play for Celtic you know,I didn't just make him up.宁雨翔 (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
WHAT?
You might as well delete all of the players with links on Celtic reserve team then as hardly any of them have played a first team game.Plus it says on WP:ATHLETE that the article can exist or be created as long as he/she played professional or amateur sports and he use to play for Inter Milan youth side(and Celtic FC youth) ,how much more amateur do you want it to be?宁雨翔 (talk) 20:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 28 | 7 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Beer category decision
As you took part in the last Great Beer Cat Discussion, I thought you might be interested in this one: A discussion has been opened on changes that have been made to the existing Beer category system. The changes reverse the decision made by the Project in April 2006. The changes were based on agreement by only two people, and by a discussion that took place outside the Beer Project. There may be some merit in the changes, and to prevent future conflict it is important that there is some discussion of the matter. If you're interested, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beer#Brewery_cats. SilkTork *YES! 18:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Miroslav Štěpánek
Sorry, but German Regionalliga is(!) fully professional.. every team is a pro team* Bneidror (talk) 20:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
WP:FOOTY discussion
Hi Angelo, not to sound annoying or anything, but I've recently started a discussion regarding the names of Brazilian clubs on wikipedia (here) and considering the scale and importance of the clubs involved and the fact that there is no formal move request, I thought it might be a good idea to inform some of the regular WP:FOOTY contributors in order to get a consensus and not just a few opinions. So if you could take a second to express your opinion, it would be appreciated, cheers. BanRay 22:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
John Terry
Hi Angelo, i am very surprised that you deleted the worldscoccer.net url because there are so many links in the wikipedia sites for football players, which should be player profiles or statistic links but they are really bad because there is often no background in the statistics. You unterstand what I mean? For example there are listed matches only by one numer which isn´t even a hyperlink for further information. So why don´t you want my suggested link from a page which stats and worldwide range is much higher than most of sport or especially football sites. This site works a little bit like wikipedia. You can get by the links from one information to another without an ending. Perhaps you can take a few minutes and watch the site. I´m sure you will nearly find everything you wish, if you are a football fan. Sorry for my bad english. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cudeferro (talk • contribs) 10:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Ok, i unterstand what you mean, but then I don´t unterstand the other links. For example: The FA profile, the BBC profile, tacticle profile at footballlineups, statistics at soccerbase and at least the fifa competition record. All these information of these pointed sites, you will get combined at worldfootball.net. But these stats are better because they are deeper. Thats why I don´t unterstand you handling the links. Why using suboptimal links if you can get better ones? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cudeferro (talk • contribs) 10:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Ah, ok. I see. Now I can understand you. Still one point because of the official sites. They are very often not the best ones. Like fifa or uefa.com. Many mistakes, wrong player names and so on :) But at least I can understand your argumentation now. Thx for the fast answers. comment added by Cudeferro (talk • contribs) 11:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Thomas Kraft
Hi Angelo!
What is the reason to delete the Thomas Kraft page again and again? You claim it is not noteworthy. I can't see that this is true, though. Thomas Kraft is part (granted replacement only) of the Bayern Munich pro squad. And main keeper of the second squad which also plays in a pro league (3rd Liga). A couple of junior national caps come on top.
This being my point I also find it absolutely inconsistent with other pages existing in the close vicinity of Kraft's page, which don't get deleted: What about these guys: Stefan Rieß and Marco Höferth? Compared with Kraft their significance is even lower as far as I can see.
Regards, OdinFK (talk) 11:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- You are wasting your time, Angelo. 3rd Liga fixtures begin tomorrow and Kraft, as the first choice goalkeeper for Bayern Munich II, will surely make his debut on the 27th of this month against Union Berlin. So really was it necessary to salt the article at this point? And don't you have better things to do with your time? ugen64 (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, "rules exist to be respected" but WP:ATHLETE is not a rule, it's a guideline. A "rule" would be, for instance, "don't revert articles more than 3 times in a 24 hour period" (and even that has exceptions). I just don't see the use of following WP:ATHLETE to the letter in every case. What is the purpose of that guideline? The purpose is to prevent Wikipedia from being filled with articles about completely non-notable footballers. Some guy who plays for an Isthmian Premier League club's academy team is certainly not notable, and we can cite this guideline in deleting that article. But someone who is on the squad of a perennial contender for the Champions League title? That is a different matter completely, in my opinion. What is the point of deleting these articles? They certainly cause no harm to Wikipedia, and in fact I think they help - because one thing we must strive for is completeness, and it makes absolutely no sense to have articles for every Bayern Munich first team player, and several reserve team players as well, except for this guy based not on a policy, but on a guideline! What is the sense in that? Bayern Munich are one of the 5 most valuable clubs in Europe, and yet their 3rd choice goalkeeper is apparently less notable than the 3rd choice goalkeeper for Carl Zeiss Jena? I guess it's an indication of Thomas Kraft's lack of notability that Bayern Munich have 2 top goalkeepers, while Kasper Jensen is lucky enough to play on the worst team in 2. Bundesliga and is therefore worthy of a Wikipedia article... ugen64 (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi again!
- While I support Ugen64's point that a guideline is not a rule and therefore exceptions can and should be made the point is mood here anyway as Kraft has had his appearance now: Kicker Match Report. Please unlock the article. By the way: Is there a way to restore the info, put into the article? When I created the article the last time, I could see that there had been different versions before, but not the content.
- Regards, OdinFK (talk) 17:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Right.
I apologize for calling you a fool, but don't you threaten me. Gcarini (talk) 19:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 29 | 14 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| From the editor: Transparency | ||
| WikiWorld: "Goregrind" | Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block | |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation | ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 30 | 21 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, an article that you nominated for proposed deletion, Fulchester United FC, which I deleted about six weeks ago has now been restored because there was an objection on my talk page. If you still feel the article does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for deletion, you are free to nominate it at WP:AFD. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
I can understand why there might be some hesitancy about accepting his Vilnius experience, as it is perhaps not fully professional.
But I'm baffled on why one would delete when he played for a second tier polish team that is fully professional - it's a league requirement. Nfitz (talk) 08:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Fausto Rossi
A bello ti scivo in italiano, penso che lo capisci...
Stai cancellando tutti i giovani calciatori con una furia mai vista..Perche? Non vedi come per esempio nelle squadre inglesi vengono inseriti anche i giovani delle squadre riseve, che hanno 18,19 o 20 anni? Prima di cancellare un Tuia o un Fausto Rossi che quest'anno probabilmente esordiranno in Serie A e comunque si allenanao con la prima squadra, pensaci 2 volte.
Stay cool man! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.57.166.71 (talk) 10:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Giovinco
Angelo allora cambia le presenze che in quelle con l'Under 21 sono conteggiate tutte le presenze comprese amichevoli Under-23, Torneo di Tolone con gli Under 23 la presenza e il gol di oggi...
Capito? Se ragioni cosi devi cambiare tutte le presenze, altrimenti fai un lavoro a metà. Ripeto, nelle 16 presenze con 3 gol con l'Under è tutto compreso, allora se vuoi farlo cambi tutto, ma le presenze le devi guardare e sistemare, non puoi arrivare e scrivere Olympic team 1 presenza 1 gol senza sapere cosa è contenuto dentro l'under 21.
O risistemi tutto o lasci come era prima. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.10.220.131 (talk) 14:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Sito FIGC
Angelo è sicuramente da apprezzare la tua buona volontà...Volevo dirti che per quanto riguarda il sito della FIGC non ti ci devi affidare completamente: le presenze vengono aggiornate molto lentamente, e spesso il sito si dimentica di alcune partite. Per quanto riguarda la cosidetta Olimpica ti informo che non compare nel sito l'amichevole ufficiale del 22 luglio, prima della partenza per Pechino, Italia-Romania 1-1 giocata a Pistoia, gol di Giuseppe Rossi.
Per il "nostro" Giovinco le presenze con l'Olimpica sono dunque 7, era d'altronde gia conteggiata questa presenza nelle 16 tutto compreso con l'Under 21.
Ti avevo detto che era gia tutto sistemato... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.10.220.131 (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, you were on the debate to delete Terry Heartsfield. Now, the article was not a hoax on my part, long story cut short, someone (my mates brother in publishing) told me about the book which was a lie, but i didn't knwo. could i have the article--Arsenalfan101 (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sinistra Democratica logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sinistra Democratica logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Deletion review for Leigh Mills
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Leigh Mills. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 31 | 28 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 32 | 9 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 33 | 11 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 34 | 18 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| From the editor: Help wanted | ||
| WikiWorld: "Cashew" | Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article | |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation | ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Appiah & Menez
Okay, but next season you will see both players, one for Roma and one for Juventus. I'm sure.--DaEazy (talk) 12:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Okay okay, I understood it. But i saw it on RAI and in the internet it is also. If you google a bit, you will find a lot. Especially you, as an Italian, will find a lot Italian sources. --DaEazy (talk) 12:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Andrea Mei & Davide Santon
Who did delete them in the Inter Squad? They are official players, look at the inter page. -.- --DaEazy (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC) They played a lot of games. Santon played against Bayern Munich, a friendly match, for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaEazy (talk • contribs) 13:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC) But i don't understand it. They are anyway official members in the team. The new players also didn't made any competitive games.....--DaEazy (talk) 13:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC) Okay, I understand the rules, but for me it doesn't make any sense. --DaEazy (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Kov 93
De mér törlöd ki???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kov 93 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Spezia 1906 logo.svg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Spezia 1906 logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 35 | 25 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 36 | 8 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Logo I Socialisti.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo I Socialisti.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 37 | 15 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Reggina calcio.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Reggina calcio.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (Image:AS Cisco Roma logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:AS Cisco Roma logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Angelo. I was wondering if you could help me.
According to Serie C2 2007-08, Cuneo were relegated to Serie D at the end of last season. However, they do not appear on the most recent update of Template:Serie D/A - where they now play - nor do they appear on Template:Serie C2. Have the Serie D templates not been updated so far this season? Bobo. 01:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protection
As you know, some IPs continue to vandalize Italy of Values, as well as Lega Nord, Forza Italia, National Alliance and other articles about Italian political parties. Don't you think that these pages need some protection? --Checco (talk) 16:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- I know. Indeed, for now, I would like you to think about protecting Italy of Values, Lega Nord and Forza Italia. --Checco (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for this edit. I did not even noticed of that edit and I don't even remember what I were doin there as I don't know anything about Mr. Carvalho. My sincere apologies. --Checco (talk) 16:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- The only explanation for that edit I was able to figure out was that I took a look at your contributions and that I pushed by mistake the "rollback" key without even noticing it. I'm very sorry... My apologies, again. --Checco (talk) 16:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Version 0.7
Hi Angelo, I'm doing the final (manual) corrections to the selection for Version 0.7, and I was wondering if you could respond to my comments here, specifically whether or not you believe that Giovanni Trapattoni warrants being assessed as C-Class rather than Start-Class? Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 05:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
DinoAvdic
Despite your final warning back in August, User:DinoAvdic keeps uploading copyrighted images. Can you do something about this?—Chowbok ☠ 02:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 42 | 8 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 43 | 10 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 44 | 17 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo UDC.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo UDC.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Forza Italia
I would like to ask you to protect Forza Italia as it is constantly vandalized. Thanks. --Checco (talk) 08:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Same problem with Law and Justice: extended vandalism. --Checco (talk) 11:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Agree with Checco. In such cases of recurrent IP vandalism, semi-protection (and for longer periods) would do. --Pan Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 16:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
The talk page for this article has been mysteriously deleted. Any idea why? Can you restore the information, if there is any? Sillyfolkboy (talk) 02:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:AC Cesena logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:AC Cesena logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
| WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:SS Murata logo.gif)
You've uploaded File:SS Murata logo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 18:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Images
But how should i upload images then? (talk)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Assistance with AN/I case
Ciao. I am dropping you this note to ask a favour. A user purporting to be italian has recently been performing unconstructive edits to numerous articles. The message on his user page leads me to suspect that he is not Italian at all, but a vandal trying to pass himself off as one, since the message seems to me to contain grammatical errors and word choices typically indicative of a non-native speaker. However, I'm not sufficiently confident of my own italian to be sure of this. I would be grateful if you could take a look, and let us know if you think the message could have been written by a native speaker. If you're willing to do this, please post your opinion in the appropriate section of AN/I or my talk page.
—David Wilson (talk · cont) 20:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help. Jobe 87's use of the words "favorito" and "godo" were in fact two of the clues which led me to suspect that he was not italian. There were a couple of others though. My understanding is that the italian gerundio ("essendo", "giocando") is never a correct translation of the english gerund ("being", "playing", used as nouns). The latter, as I understand it, nearly always has to be translated into an infinitive ("essere", "giocare").
- The other peculiarity was "fumetti di osservazione" which translates literally as "observation comics", an english term I have never heard of, and could not find any trace of with a google search. I did come across the term "observation cartoons", however, which seems to be the only thing that Job 87 could have been referring to. But if that were the case, "vignette di osservazione" would seem to have been a more appropriate translation.
- Thanks again.
- —David Wilson (talk · cont) 07:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Need help on edit war on Thiago Emiliano da Silva
There is two fact i know. 1st Thiago Emiliano da Silva not yet a AC Milan player as Lega Calcio nor AC Milan.com stated the transfer is completed and signed a contract (although he receive a friendly callup like Pato). Fact 2 CBF-Brazilian FA list that he is a player of Tombense Futebol Clube. Edit war between me and User:Gcarini should be solved. Matthew_hk tc 08:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by 03:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC) at §hepBot (Disable)
Serie A 2008–09 Top Goalscorers
I've seen a lot of what you've done on the Wiki, and I have to commend you for all that. However, with all due respect, I don't think the page looks as good with that long list on there. While you may prefer it, it may not be the best option for the page and the rest of the community; that is why I replaced it with a shorter table. It still relays the information that's required (granted with the excessive entries removed), all while making the page cleaner and smaller. I've posted a discussion on the Talk page expressing my full opinion and reasoning there, and I'd love to get your full opinion on the matter since the edit summary can only hold so much. I know it was very straightforward and simple, but I didn't want to start a revert war without attempting to discuss it first; I'm just looking for the best interests of the page and the community, and I just think the table would better suit it, despite the previous seasons all having a list (or at least a shorter list on the current page). --Snojoe (talk) 10:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)