Jump to content

Talk:George Newhouse: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 44: Line 44:


The edit of the article made at 19:42, 27 January 2009 by IP address 124.188.112.223 contains unreferenced information Please reference your source for this edit, otherwise please refer to the policy regarding editing biographies of living persons. Until this edit is sourced, I have reverted the article to the original referenced version. [[Special:Contributions/203.214.155.209|203.214.155.209]] ([[User talk:203.214.155.209|talk]]) 11:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
The edit of the article made at 19:42, 27 January 2009 by IP address 124.188.112.223 contains unreferenced information Please reference your source for this edit, otherwise please refer to the policy regarding editing biographies of living persons. Until this edit is sourced, I have reverted the article to the original referenced version. [[Special:Contributions/203.214.155.209|203.214.155.209]] ([[User talk:203.214.155.209|talk]]) 11:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


This is hilarious. It is obviously George or one of the labor party lackeys censoring George's wikipedia page!!! The spin doctors are at it again! [[Special:Contributions/61.14.187.12|61.14.187.12]] ([[User talk:61.14.187.12|talk]]) 06:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:04, 30 January 2009

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAustralia: Law Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconGeorge Newhouse is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.


Fair use rationale for Image:George with lifeguard.jpg

Image:George with lifeguard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:George indigenous.jpg

Image:George indigenous.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate eligibility

The article says that Liberal legal advice reveals Newhouse is ineligible to stand for election. 2 points: First, the article should also state Labor's legal advice which says he is eligible. Second, the paragraph needs a reference.--Lester 03:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No discussion? OK, I just reworded it myself, and added a reference.--Lester 07:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mayor of Waverley

He is no longer mayor of waverley council. he resigned before the election. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.93.8 (talk) 07:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Biased editing

The text edited 5 minutes prior to the discussion post "This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that are poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. The reports that are being quoted are currently subject to litigation", is properly sourced to reliable Australian news publications as per Wikipedia guidelines. They are not controversial - simply follow the links to the published articles. Please source your own information that these published reports are subject to litigation and they will be retracted immediately. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.155.209 (talk) 11:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More biased editing

The edit of the article made at 19:42, 27 January 2009 by IP address 124.188.112.223 contains unreferenced information Please reference your source for this edit, otherwise please refer to the policy regarding editing biographies of living persons. Until this edit is sourced, I have reverted the article to the original referenced version. 203.214.155.209 (talk) 11:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This is hilarious. It is obviously George or one of the labor party lackeys censoring George's wikipedia page!!! The spin doctors are at it again! 61.14.187.12 (talk) 06:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]