User talk:Mikeblas: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 30d) to User talk:Mikeblas/Archives/2008/December. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
::There are no footnotes, so it'll be difficult to verify any of it. The "Biography" section is still completely un-sourced. We don't even know if that's a picture of the subject in question. -- [[User:Mikeblas|Mikeblas]] ([[User talk:Mikeblas#top|talk]]) 00:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
::There are no footnotes, so it'll be difficult to verify any of it. The "Biography" section is still completely un-sourced. We don't even know if that's a picture of the subject in question. -- [[User:Mikeblas|Mikeblas]] ([[User talk:Mikeblas#top|talk]]) 00:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::I added a couple footnotes to verify the sessions he played, at least one chart single, and his Grammy award. Actually, a year is ''nothing'' for a country music article. Almost all of the country music articles are crap because no one gives a [bad word] about them. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 00:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
:::I added a couple footnotes to verify the sessions he played, at least one chart single, and his Grammy award. Actually, a year is ''nothing'' for a country music article. Almost all of the country music articles are crap because no one gives a [bad word] about them. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 00:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Leave wikipedia== |
|||
You are so useless, you flag useful articls as one lacking notability. It's probably because you lack notability. |
|||
People like you cannot create anything useful, you just want to delete things made by others. |
Revision as of 02:34, 1 February 2009
|
Welcome!
Hello Mikeblas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 17:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Mike Shinoda
Dear Mikeblas, I've tried to find a solution. Instead of continuing to write "nu metal and rapcore", I've removed "rapcore" from the intro, also because there isn't under Shinoda's picture. Egr, 5/7/2006
Question
I don't know if this is the proper way to get in touch with mikeblas, but I'll try it.
It appears that mikeblas removed some material that I added to the entry "Radio Receiver". I don't understand what was objectionable about my submission. Can mikeblas or anyone else explain?
Gerry9999 K8EF— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gfoley9999 (talk • contribs)
Recovering deleted Sara Jay material
- Moved to User talk:Quarl
Adminship
Hi Mikeblas, I think you would make a good administrator on the English Wikipedia. Any interest? —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-14 05:30Z
Image copyright problem with Image:Feelings.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Feelings.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC
…needs fixing not deletion. "Unsourced BLP" is usually a reason to try and find sources first, not to put up for deletion. Granted, his peak was in the 1970s, so there aren't too many online sources about him, but still, the article asserts that he's won a Grammy, so I'd say yes, he is quite notable and should have his article sourced up. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've cleaned it up, and added an infobox and sources. No offense, but did you somehow skip over WP:BEFORE? If it's an article on a musician, Allmusic is usually the first place I check. He has a rather lengthy bio there (which I've added as a ref), so I have absolutely no doubt that he's notable now. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- There are no footnotes, so it'll be difficult to verify any of it. The "Biography" section is still completely un-sourced. We don't even know if that's a picture of the subject in question. -- Mikeblas (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- I added a couple footnotes to verify the sessions he played, at least one chart single, and his Grammy award. Actually, a year is nothing for a country music article. Almost all of the country music articles are crap because no one gives a [bad word] about them. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- There are no footnotes, so it'll be difficult to verify any of it. The "Biography" section is still completely un-sourced. We don't even know if that's a picture of the subject in question. -- Mikeblas (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Leave wikipedia
You are so useless, you flag useful articls as one lacking notability. It's probably because you lack notability. People like you cannot create anything useful, you just want to delete things made by others.