Jump to content

User talk:Darth Panda: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Darth Panda (talk | contribs)
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Darth Panda/Archive 3.
Line 10: Line 10:
|archive = User talk:Darth Panda/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = User talk:Darth Panda/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}

== [[Esenthel Engine]] ==

I don't quite agree with your rationale that "it's not spam" and "can be improved" (with what?). I am going to AFD on this. See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esenthel Engine]]. No hard feelings; I just disagree. Thank you, [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 06:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
:Haha, no problem. I was considering prodding, but my rational for declining the speedy can be found on the AfD. Thanks for taking the time to notify me! <font color="777777">[[User:Darth_Panda|D<small>ARTH</small> P<small>ANDA</small>]]</font><sup><small>[[User_talk:Darth_Panda|<font color="990000">duel</font>]]&nbsp;&bull; [[Special:Contributions/Darth Panda|<font color="990000">work</font>]]</small></sup> 12:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
::I was too, but it was already prodded. Cheers, [[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 17:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

== RE:Reversion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esenthel Engine ==

Hi, I was using the Anti-Vandal tool for spelling and I accidentally clicked revert. Sorry for any inconvienience. [[User:Manadude2|manadude2]] ([[User talk:Manadude2|talk]]) 12:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
{{talkback|manadude2}}

== Re:FLC ==

Sorry, I usually don't copy-edit series I'm not familiar with, especially plot summaries in which I usually take great care to ensure that there's no [[WP:WEIGHT|undue weight]]. — <font face="Segoe Script">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''sephiroth bcr'''</font>]]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 11:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith ==

Hello. Please forgive the spam but since [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith]] is heading toward a very close decision, I'm contacting all editors who were in the "Neutral" section in the hope that they can take a second look at the RfA and make a more explicit recommendation (either way). Thank you, [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 18:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


== RfA thankspam ==
== RfA thankspam ==

Revision as of 13:27, 1 February 2009

SEMI-RETIRED
I am retiring my public face. I will continue to edit with NocturneNoir (talk · contribs). Any questions about warnings or reported vandalism should be directed to this account.

RfA thankspam

Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.

Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board.

Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better.

Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith (talk), 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Denbot (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nestor Aparicio

I've asked for semi-protection - then I think we'll have to go some way back to get an unvandalised version. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That page is getting annhilated right now. DARTH PANDAduel • work 15:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For all your hard work reverting vandalism, (in which you beat me to it most of the time.) :) lol. Keep it up! astatine-210 discovered elements, what am I? 15:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! DARTH PANDAduel • work 15:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your welcome! ;) astatine-210 discovered elements, what am I? 15:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nester

He being under investigation is not vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloud8a (talkcontribs) 16:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Matt Corker

Hello,

Regarding my previous post editing Matt Corker,

You have, for want of a better word, rejected my post.

Please note, I happen to be good friends with his cousin Shaun Kerr and there is nothing in this which isn't the truth.

All information in this post is accurate and may be interesting to people that wish to read about Matt Corker.

If you require more evidence then please advise as I can quite easily facilitate.

I suggest you rethink your rejection of my post.

Yours faithfully,

Scott G. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottygriff (talkcontribs) 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, evidence would be good. Content must be from a neutral point of view. Your edit ("All in all, the Corker/Kerr family, boasts an eclectic mix of both brawn and brain at any given social event.") clearly favored Corker, which is unacceptable. "starring in films such as: Violence Is The Answer and Where Eagles Fly. He has also starred on stage, appearing as 'The Bookeeper' in 'The Bookshop' sketch in his sixth year show, the mandatory stage performance of the year." is perfectly fine, but material like "Shaun Kerr is his cousin, standing at a modest 6ft and 11 stones exactly, looks up to the rugby prodigy. His comments on his cousin include, "He is brick" and "He carries the throne of the Corker family"." is irrelevant to the article and should also not be included. If you can source the film appearances, that is the only material that would be allowed in the article. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks. DARTH PANDAduel • work 01:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]