Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Zanika Lache: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
comments |
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Washington |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Created by COI/SPA account. Not sure if it is notable enough for an article. Discuss. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
Created by COI/SPA account. Not sure if it is notable enough for an article. Discuss. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' This is a good faith editor. I told him/her about the username issue, but nobody suggested that s/he change his/her name. I'm not sure why everyone is so down on this editor, who is making good contributions, if also newbie-ish mistakes. I'm not sure the camp is notable, but deleting it because of a supposed SPA issue (s/he has also edited the article [[Camp Fire USA]] and made corrections to the Girl Scouts article) is wrong. Yes it's obviously likely there is connection with the camp or council with the same name. Perhaps the article could be merged and redirected to an appropriate target. I'm really tempted to bring up [[WP:NOHARM]], but of course that wouldn't fly. My declared COI is that I was a longtime member of Camp Fire, a camp counselor and a recipient of the WoHeLo medallion. That and $5 will get me a latte at Starbucks. Now can we find another solution like merging this to an article about the local council? [[User:Katr67|Katr67]] ([[User talk:Katr67|talk]]) 17:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' This is a good faith editor. I told him/her about the username issue, but nobody suggested that s/he change his/her name. I'm not sure why everyone is so down on this editor, who is making good contributions, if also newbie-ish mistakes. I'm not sure the camp is notable, but deleting it because of a supposed SPA issue (s/he has also edited the article [[Camp Fire USA]] and made corrections to the Girl Scouts article) is wrong. Yes it's obviously likely there is connection with the camp or council with the same name. Perhaps the article could be merged and redirected to an appropriate target. I'm really tempted to bring up [[WP:NOHARM]], but of course that wouldn't fly. My declared COI is that I was a longtime member of Camp Fire, a camp counselor and a recipient of the WoHeLo medallion. That and $5 will get me a latte at Starbucks. Now can we find another solution like merging this to an article about the local council? [[User:Katr67|Katr67]] ([[User talk:Katr67|talk]]) 17:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Washington|list of Washington-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 17:49, 1 February 2009
- Camp Zanika Lache (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Created by COI/SPA account. Not sure if it is notable enough for an article. Discuss. Cirt (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Comment This is a good faith editor. I told him/her about the username issue, but nobody suggested that s/he change his/her name. I'm not sure why everyone is so down on this editor, who is making good contributions, if also newbie-ish mistakes. I'm not sure the camp is notable, but deleting it because of a supposed SPA issue (s/he has also edited the article Camp Fire USA and made corrections to the Girl Scouts article) is wrong. Yes it's obviously likely there is connection with the camp or council with the same name. Perhaps the article could be merged and redirected to an appropriate target. I'm really tempted to bring up WP:NOHARM, but of course that wouldn't fly. My declared COI is that I was a longtime member of Camp Fire, a camp counselor and a recipient of the WoHeLo medallion. That and $5 will get me a latte at Starbucks. Now can we find another solution like merging this to an article about the local council? Katr67 (talk) 17:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)