User talk:Darth Panda

SEMI-RETIRED

I am retiring my public face. I will continue to edit with NocturneNoir (talk · contribs). Any questions about warnings or reported vandalism should be directed to this account.

YOUR ENTIRE LIFE IS A STEAMING PICE OF EPIC FAIL 71.254.202.46 (talk) 04:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

RfA thankspam

		Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith (talk), 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Denbot (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Nestor Aparicio

I've asked for semi-protection - then I think we'll have to go some way back to get an unvandalised version. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. That page is getting annhilated right now. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 15:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your hard work reverting vandalism, (in which you beat me to it most of the time.) :) lol. Keep it up! astatine-210 discovered elements, what am I? 15:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 15:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome! ;) astatine-210 ^{discovered elements, what am I?} 15:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Nester

He being under investigation is not vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloud8a (talk • contribs) 16:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

RE:Matt Corker

Hello,

Regarding my previous post editing Matt Corker,

You have, for want of a better word, rejected my post.

Please note, I happen to be good friends with his cousin Shaun Kerr and there is nothing in this which isn't the truth.

All information in this post is accurate and may be interesting to people that wish to read about Matt Corker.

If you require more evidence then please advise as I can quite easily facilitate.

I suggest you rethink your rejection of my post.

Yours faithfully,

Scott G. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottygriff (talk • contribs) 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, evidence would be good. Content must be from a neutral point of view. Your edit ("All in all, the Corker/Kerr family, boasts an eclectic mix of both brawn and brain at any given social event.") clearly favored Corker, which is unacceptable. "starring in films such as: Violence Is The Answer and Where Eagles Fly. He has also starred on stage, appearing as 'The Bookeeper' in 'The Bookshop' sketch in his sixth year show, the mandatory stage performance of the year." is perfectly fine, but material like "Shaun Kerr is his cousin, standing at a modest 6ft and 11 stones exactly, looks up to the rugby prodigy. His comments on his cousin include, "He is brick" and "He carries the throne of the Corker family"." is irrelevant to the article and should also not be included. If you can source the film appearances, that is the only material that would be allowed in the article. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 01:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Your opinion

How do you think I would do in a RfA right now? astatine-210 ^{discovered elements, what am I?} 20:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I did a very cursory glance at your contributions (as I don't have the time right now to fully look at them) and I have a few comments. You seem like the anti-vandal type of user, and those rarely pass unless they're absolutely perfect in their work (see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/J.delanoy 2 for one of the only successful ones in recent memory). That being said, you have absolutely zero article work that I can see of, which is one of the main criteria for adminship these days. In addition, you have only 747 contribs at the time of writing. In general, 3000 is minimum amount of edits (and occasionally 4000). As a vandal reverter, you will need substantially more to prove your worth. Finally, your user account first began editing on January 26, just a few days ago. You need at least six months experience (in the eyes of most RfA voters) to even have a chance of passing. And that's just the basic criteria.

In addition, on your user page, you claim "Hi, i'm astatine-210, who was an old, knowledgeable user who decided to get a fresh start because I had been a victim of bad Wikistalking." If this is true, RfA will force you to reveal your old name (unfortunately) and I'm not sure you'd really wish to do that.

In the words of a good friend of mine, "Anybody who asks 'How will I do at RfA now?' will generally fail." I'd advise waiting at least another five months with solid antivandalism and article work, and you'll have a shot. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 20:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

The most recent one I can remember is this one. But thanks. ;) astatine-210 ^{discovered elements, what am I?} 20:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Right, but he hasn't passed yet. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 20:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I know, but it looks good. I have a few article contribs, and created an article, but I cant have too many because I can't think of anything to add. astatine-210 ^{discovered elements, what am I?} 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Not so sure what you mean. 10/20/2 at 33% does not look good at all, considering it has little chance of passing. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)