Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Zanika Lache: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:21, 3 February 2009

Camp Zanika Lache

Created by COI/SPA account. Not sure if it is notable enough for an article. Discuss. Cirt (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a good faith editor. I told him/her about the username issue, but nobody suggested that s/he change his/her name. I'm not sure why everyone is so down on this editor, who is making good contributions, if also newbie-ish mistakes. I'm not sure the camp is notable, but deleting it because of a supposed SPA issue (s/he has also edited the article Camp Fire USA and made corrections to the Girl Scouts article) is wrong. Yes it's obviously likely there is connection with the camp or council with the same name. Perhaps the article could be merged and redirected to an appropriate target. I'm really tempted to bring up WP:NOHARM, but of course that wouldn't fly. My declared COI is that I was a longtime member of Camp Fire, a camp counselor and a recipient of the WoHeLo medallion. That and $5 will get me a latte at Starbucks. Now can we find another solution like merging this to an article about the local council? Katr67 (talk) 17:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comment Since getting the message this morning I have changed my name as you can see. I read the rules but did not think it would be a problem. the only reason I added the webpage because I saw that there were other camps in Washington with the wikipages, (Camp Sealth, Camp Orkila ) there is a list of summer camps with links to their pages so I did not think it would be a problem to add one for zanika. There isn't one for its council cause the camp is more well known than the council. Sorry for making it seem like it was spam, but I have changed my name now.--Abebless (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I haven't change my name, I just started a new account because I am blocked and can not try and request a name change at this time.--Abebless (talk) 18:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comments: First: take a look at Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Second: the big problem with these types of article is in establishing notability outside the local area. I'm not very familiar with Camp Fire organization, but if it is as similar to the BSA as I understand, then camps are not separate legal entities and they exist primarily to serve the local council. You are jumping from a national organization to a chunk of a local chapter; you really need to work from the top down. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 19:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Based on the two news articles cited in the article's references, it seems to me like it satisfies WP:Verifiability and WP:Notability. Furthermore, while it does seem to need some cleanup to make it not read like an advertisement, it doesn't seem like the best course of action would be to delete it. --Aka042 (talk) 19:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While I am not entirely convinced that a summer camp is particularly notable, Wikipedia seems to have established that articles on summer camps are worth keeping. Take a look at Category:Summer camps in the United States, which lists quite a number of camps in the US. I took a look at some of them, and most do not seem more notable than this one. I know, this sounds like WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but the point is that we do have established categories and subcategories for summer camps. •••Life of Riley (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The references provided, specially the Seattle PI article seems to indicate that this camp is notable. By looking at the category it seems that we do have an established tradition of including summer camps. --J.Mundo (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete and userfy; The subject is not entirely unredeemable, but the article fails to show proper notability outside of the local area. Per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Non-commercial organizations:

Individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not notable enough to warrant a separate article unless sufficient notability is established through reliable sources that extend beyond the organization's local area.

While notability is not inherited up or down, the lack of any connection to the local council or to the national organization makes it difficult to asses the subject in context. It does not show how it serves the youth of the council and has only one illustration of serving youth outside the organization. I recommend that the article be userfied, expanded into a council-level article and reviewed before returning to articlespace; I will be glad to help in this process --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 16:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Keep.''' While I am not entirely convinced that a summer camp is particularly notable, Wikipedia seems to have established that articles on summer camps are worth keeping. Take a look at [[:Category:Summer camps in the United States]], which lists quite a number of camps in the US. I took a look at some of them, and most do not seem more notable than this one. I know, this sounds like [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]], but the point is that we do have established categories and subcategories for summer camps. •••[[User:Life of Riley|Life of Riley]] ([[User talk:Life of Riley|talk]]) 22:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Keep'''  The references provided,  specially the Seattle PI article seems to indicate that this camp is notable. By looking at the category it seems that we do have an established tradition of including summer camps. --[[User:Jmundo|J.Mundo]] ([[User talk:Jmundo|talk]]) 14:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
+* '''delete''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Userfication|userfy]]'''; The subject is not entirely unredeemable, but the article fails to show proper notability outside of the local area. Per [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Non-commercial organizations]]:
+<blockquote>
+Individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not notable enough to warrant a separate article unless sufficient notability is established through reliable sources that extend beyond the organization's local area.
+</blockquote>
+:While notability is not inherited up or down, the lack of any connection to the local council or to the national organization makes it difficult to asses the subject in context. It does not show how it serves the youth of the council and has only one illustration of serving youth outside the organization. I recommend that the article be userfied, expanded into a council-level article and reviewed before returning to articlespace; I will be glad to help in this process --—<i><b>—&nbsp;[[User:Gadget850|<font color = "gray">Gadget850&nbsp;(Ed)</font>]]<font color = "darkblue">&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Gadget850|''talk'']]</sup></font></b> - </i> 16:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)