User talk:ADM/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
k |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Blocked == |
|||
<div style="padding:5px; border:2px solid #F00; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|left|40px]] You have been '''indefinitely blocked''' from editing in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]. To contest this block, please email me or place <nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> on your page, including an explanation why you feel you should be unblocked. [[Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages|{{PAGENAME}}]] <!--{{s/block3}}--></div> |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|All I was editing about were recent news topics about Jewish-Christian problems that everyone knows about by now. So I would like if you would unblock, I can maybe send you an e-mail. [[User:ADM|ADM]] ([[User talk:ADM#top|talk]]) 21:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)|decline=The block notice was not terribly informative. But it seems that the blocking administrator, [[User talk:JzG|JzG]], might reconsider if you could respond appropriately to the concerns expressed at AN and ANI, which I have linked below. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)}} |
|||
:Note, you can still send the admin that blocked you an email through [[Special:EmailUser/JzG|this]]. Hope this helps, [[User:Thehelpfulone|<font color="red">'''The'''</font>]][[User_talk:Thehelpfulone|<font color="black"> '''Helpful'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Thehelpfulone|<font color="red"> '''One'''</font>]] 08:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Concerns expressed at [[WP:AN]] and [[WP:ANI]] == |
|||
[[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#ADM a Single-purpose account; Hate Speech.]] |
|||
In [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AReuters&diff=267381816&oldid=248225326 this diff] you expressed concern about Reuters, given that it was founded by a Jew. You [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AADM&diff=268189636&oldid=268072415 removed a warning] that was left to you about that comment, without giving any response. |
|||
[[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive511#User:ADM a Single-purpose account.3F]] |
|||
*Please consider responding to these complaints. If you believe that you have an answer, make a new unblock request and another admin will consider it. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|1=I did not make any definitve claims about Reuters, all I wanted to do was to try and open a discussion or debate about Reuters' take on the Israel/Palestinian conflict, on which I strongly suspect it of being pro-Israel, not because it was founded by a Hebraic person, but rather because it seemed to have a slant during the recent 2008-2009 Gaza conflict. This is the exact same thing that the President of Turkey was saying recently, he is a man of strong conviction. Also see this interesting statement by Tzipora Menache. I am very much used to reading European and Arab papers that are not pro-Israel, this is why I thought Reuters might have a peculiar take on this. I feel that this ban is kind of a thoughtcrime for whoever might want to share different views for the sake of neutrality.|decline=Wikipedia is not the appropriate place to speculate about the insidious political leanings of others; we're here to write an encyclopedia, not to function as a blog. — '''<font face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0">kur</font>]][[User talk:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0">ykh</font>]]</font>''' 05:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)}} |
|||