Talk:Freight forwarding

POV

This article reads like a sales pitch taken from a freight forwarder's PowerPoint. There is a ton of noise and promises, but little objective fact. 70.251.32.227 (talk) 02:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

You've deleted a cited description of a freight forwarding, the description as stated by FIATA who represent 40,000 forwarding and logistics firms worldwide. Yes this is POV of the industry, not a personal point of view. What is you problem? What noise? Promises??? Seriously, you need to explain because I see no problem. I have undone your edit until you provide a sensible explanation. --Pnb73 (talk) 11:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

The previous description is clearly POV, and is incredibly distracting, using all kinds of vague language. It's doesn't just reference FIATA's definition, either, it accepts it as gospel. You also removed my POV tag on this article, which any article listing "buzzwords" as a section clearly falls into. 70.251.147.224 (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

So, what you're saying is; the definition of freight forwarding as stated by a huge worldwide organisation, representing the industry and referenced as such is POV. But your definition, not cited is not POV?!

Please clarify exactly what is incredibly distracting and list all the kinds of vague language. I am able to read the preface without being distracted and understand the language used with ease so I need an explanation.

Any article listing a section called buzzwords makes it POV???? Please show me this rule.

As your criticism is very vague and distracting please give a full explanation of who, what, where this has bias so we can correct this and move on. --Pnb73 (talk) 03:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)