Jump to content

Talk:Legion of Merit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RoclorD (talk | contribs)
Grafics: new section
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by RoclorD - "Grafics: new section"
Line 71: Line 71:
== Grafics ==
== Grafics ==


I wonder is my las edit good or is the file names bad. If so could some admin delete it and reupload with proper names so there will be no more misunderstandings?
I wonder is my las edit good or is the file names bad. If so could some admin delete it and reupload with proper names so there will be no more misunderstandings? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:RoclorD|RoclorD]] ([[User talk:RoclorD|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/RoclorD|contribs]]) 19:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 19:56, 14 February 2009

WikiProject iconOrders, decorations, and medals Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: North America / United States C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

the Legion of Merit is issued in the following degrees:

   * Chief Commander - Chief of State or Head of Government

Peter de la Billiere was a Chief Commander. This seems to be possible error in this article.

Ian Smith, the former Rhodesian Prime Minister, is a Grand Commander of the Legion of Merit (GCLM). I've linked it here but it occurs that it may not be the same Legion of Merit. Does anyone know? David | Talk 12:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recipients of Legion of Merit

Is the link at the bottom of the article listing the recipients of the LoM supposed to be all-inclusive? Because it isn't so far. How does one go about editing the actual list?

Recipients of Legion of Merit

Martin Clemens recently issued an open letter to the people of the Solomon Islands where he worked as a Coast Watcher during WWII (http://www.roymorgan.com/news/press-releases/2006/482/). He was awarded the Legion of Merit for his services during the Guadalcanal campaign. A precise of his story is available on the US Marine Raiders page: (http://www.usmarineraiders.org/book1.htm). The list needs to be updated (as per the previous post).

Rear Admiral Rodger Simpson

Why was he removed? Is he not considered notable? ScreaminEagle 14:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not particularly. The category for Legion of Merit recipients has something like 400-500 names, all of people considered notable enough to be in wikipedia. Not all deserve a mention in this article. Rodger Simpson, in that regard, is pretty low on the importance scale. Not to mention the editor who added that name has been making bizarre edits for some time, hyping the ship he was once stationed on - you guessed it, the USS Simpson. --Nobunaga24 01:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thank you for the explanation. It's article lists like these that leave me a bit uncertain as to how notable a wikiperson should be to be included, so I usually just stay away from them as a rule. Are there any general guidelines that would help folks like myself know who can be appropriately "singled out" for lists like these and who doesn't make the cut? --ScreaminEagle 20:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would say for these short lists in the award's main article, I would list (and this is just my rule of thumb) people more well known to the general public. In other words, a famous general, or even an actor who fought in a war, or someone notable for the uniqueness of their award - i.e. he was awarded 48 silver stars in his career (no one ever has been). Simpson meets none of the criteria; additionally (as stated above) the editor contributing that has been making a number of questionable edits - I no longer assume good faith from him ;)--Nobunaga24 00:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Recipients

In my opinion the heading "Notable Recipients" is redundant and potentially insulting to recipients not listed. My thinking is that anyone who receives this decoration is obviously notable otherwise he or she would not have received the metal.Kinema 09:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so sure about that. My uncle received one, but I doubt anyone here has ever heard of him. I also doubt he'd cry himself to sleep if you told him he wasn't notable, either. It's not like the Medal of Honor; just getting one doesn't make you notable, at least not in the eyes of Wikipedia. If they can't get an article of their own based on what they've done in their lives/careers, they're not notable. So I think making the distinction is a good one. It recognizes that many people have received the award, but these are the people who have received it and are also notable for other achievements in their lives. --ScreaminEagle 16:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Republican Presidential Legion of Merit

Should we do a disambig for the political award of similar name and similar appearance? 155.84.57.253 (talk) 13:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Commander

Is this similar to the Grand Crosses of other orders? Does it come with a breast star and sash? 130.195.5.7 (talk) 01:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for one it's Chief Commander, not Grand Commander, and no, no sash is associated with the LOM. The award itself is worn on the right chest, if I'm not mistaken. I don't know of any U.S. awards that are placed on sashes. --ScreaminEagle (talk) 18:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

King Olav V of Norway

Can someone ad the late King Olav V of Norway to the list of notable recepiants.:

He receaved the US Legion of Merit award

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olav_V_of_Norway

http://www.kongehuset.no/c29380/artikkel/vis.html?tid=29386

Mortyman (talk) 04:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume he was awarded the Chief Commander Legion of Merit as a head of state rather than in a military function? --ScreaminEagle (talk) 18:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grafics

I wonder is my las edit good or is the file names bad. If so could some admin delete it and reupload with proper names so there will be no more misunderstandings? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RoclorD (talkcontribs) 19:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]