Talk:EPA (disambiguation): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:41, 17 February 2009

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation

Requested move

EPA (disambiguation) → EPA — EPA is important enough to be a primary dab page. — -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Comment. Applicable previous discussion (with controversial close) at Talk:Environmental Protection Agency. Please show evidence that the current redirect is not the primary topic. I've restored the redirect to its original target until one can be decided upon through this discussion. Dekimasuよ! 02:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support The primary topic of EPA arguably is not United States Environmental Protection Agency but rather Environmental Protection Agency, which itself is a dab page. --Una Smith (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That Environmental Protection Agency is a dab page is also a problem. The primary topic for Environmental Protection Agency is also the U.S. agency, and that article should probably be at Environmental Protection Agency, since that is the most commonly used and recognized name for that agency. --Born2cycle (talk) 05:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aervanath (talk) 08:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Current redirect is US-centric, but in the USA, EPA unqualified does mean the US agency. Best solution is for EPA to be a dab page. Andrewa (talk) 11:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per above US-centric reason cited above. --Natural R_X 17:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

STRONG OPPOSE I looked over EPA (disambiguation) and all those other uses don't come close to the U.S. agency in usage. If you google for EPA, most hits are for the U.S. agency; no other use gets any kind of coverage. If the U.S. Agency is not the primary topic for EPA, then there is no such thing as a primary topic. --Born2cycle (talk) 05:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong oppose. The (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency is without doubt the primary topic here... I couldn't find a single hit without great effort for any other usage. Omnibus (talk) 02:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 *'''STRONG OPPOSE''' I looked over [[EPA (disambiguation)]] and all those other uses don't come close to the U.S. agency in usage.  If you google for EPA, most hits are for the U.S. agency; no other use gets any kind of coverage.  If the U.S. Agency is not the [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC|primary topic]] for EPA, then there is no such thing as a primary topic.  --[[User:Born2cycle|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle|talk]]) 05:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Very strong oppose'''.  The Environmental Protection Agency is without doubt the primary topic here... I couldn't find a single hit without great effort for any other usage. [[User:Omnibus|Omnibus]] ([[User talk:Omnibus|talk]]) 02:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Very strong oppose'''.  The (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency is without doubt the primary topic here... I couldn't find a single hit without great effort for any other usage. [[User:Omnibus|Omnibus]] ([[User talk:Omnibus|talk]]) 02:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 ===Discussion===