Scatchard equation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
A binding experiment using a regular spectrophotometer is a real-life application of this equation. Here we define he change in absorbance at differing concentrations of ligand as delta A (at a constant wavelength, typically whichever one gives you the largest number) The concentration of the protein is held constant, and the absorbance is measured at different concentrations of total ligand until everything is saturated. The fraction saturation (represented by the greek letter Ɵ) is equal to the absorbance minus the absorbance when the ligand concentration is zero, divided by the absorbance at saturation minus the absorbance when the ligand concentration is zero. Or to put it another way, |
A binding experiment using a regular spectrophotometer is a real-life application of this equation. Here we define he change in absorbance at differing concentrations of ligand as delta A (at a constant wavelength, typically whichever one gives you the largest number) The concentration of the protein is held constant, and the absorbance is measured at different concentrations of total ligand until everything is saturated. The fraction saturation (represented by the greek letter Ɵ) is equal to the absorbance minus the absorbance when the ligand concentration is zero, divided by the absorbance at saturation minus the absorbance when the ligand concentration is zero. Or to put it another way, |
||
<math>Ɵ=ΔA/ΔAmax</math> |
<math>Ɵ=ΔA/ΔAmax</math> |
||
Now we have to take into account the number of binding sites per molecule of protein. This requires a second equation <math>nƟ=v</math> where n is the number of binding sites. If you don't know the number of binding sites, take v to equal the amount of ligand bound (assume all ligand binds until saturated, and throw out the point where it is saturated) divided by the total protein. |
|||
Given the following example data for this experiment, it is possible to use the Scatchard plot to calculate Ka. In this example, assume that 1 ligand binds to 1 protein. |
|||
⚫ | |||
(example pending permission from author) |
|||
Now we simply plot Ɵ/L versus Ɵ (if we had more ligand binding per protein we would say that nƟ=v, where n is the number of binding sites and v is the ligand bound divided by the total protein) |
|||
If you plot this example (don't forget to calculate Ɵ) you will get a nice linear plot with a slope equal to -Ka, a y-intercept of nKa, and an x-intercept of n. (in this example the Ka = 8.0X10^3) |
|||
⚫ | |||
== See == |
== See == |
||
* [http://www.graphpad.com/curvefit/scatchard_plots.htm some explanation] |
* [http://www.graphpad.com/curvefit/scatchard_plots.htm some explanation] |
Revision as of 15:49, 17 February 2009
The Scatchard equation is an equation for calculating the affinity constant of a ligand with a protein. The Scatchard equation is given by
where r is the ratio of the concentration of bound ligand to total available binding sites, c is the concentration of free ligand, and n is the number of binding sites per protein molecule.
Ka is the association (affinity) constant from the equation
where Ab is the binding site on the antibody, Ag is a monovalent antigen, and Ag-Ab is antigen-bound antibody.
The Scatchard equation is sometimes referred to as the Rosenthal-Scatchard equation.
Plotting this data, r/c vs r, yields the Scatchard plot with a slope -Ka and an X-intercept of nKa. Relative binding affinities between two sites can be distinguished with a line showing identical affinity and a curve showing different affinities.
The Scatchard equation is named after the former MIT Chemistry Department member George Scatchard, an American chemist, 1892–1973.
A real-life example: A binding experiment using a regular spectrophotometer is a real-life application of this equation. Here we define he change in absorbance at differing concentrations of ligand as delta A (at a constant wavelength, typically whichever one gives you the largest number) The concentration of the protein is held constant, and the absorbance is measured at different concentrations of total ligand until everything is saturated. The fraction saturation (represented by the greek letter Ɵ) is equal to the absorbance minus the absorbance when the ligand concentration is zero, divided by the absorbance at saturation minus the absorbance when the ligand concentration is zero. Or to put it another way, Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle Ɵ=ΔA/ΔAmax} Now we have to take into account the number of binding sites per molecule of protein. This requires a second equation Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle nƟ=v} where n is the number of binding sites. If you don't know the number of binding sites, take v to equal the amount of ligand bound (assume all ligand binds until saturated, and throw out the point where it is saturated) divided by the total protein. If you plot v/L versus 1/v you will get a nice linear plot with a slope equal to -Ka, a y-intercept of nKa, and an x-intercept of n. CAUTION!!! If you wind up with a data set that is NOT linear by the Scatchard plot, you have COOPERATIVITY. In case of cooperativity, please see the Hill equation.