User talk:Ihaveabutt: Difference between revisions
→Casolaro talkpage comment: new section |
Ihaveabutt (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 05:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC) |
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 05:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
<blockquote>This reply uses emotion and attack words, but I don't have time to discuss it</blockquote>. However, I am going to correct mistakes I made in my prior Cosalora entry. |
|||
⚫ | |||
If you wish to debate elements of logic, go to a philosophy forum. Wikipedia articles are written hopefully to inform, to present factual information. In your arguments against David Corn's grammatical structure and syntax, perhaps you are correct. Whether or not, your arguments about Corn's sentence structure are relevant to the [[Danny Casolaro]] article is not debatable as far as I am concerned. They appear to be disruptive and self-serving. Some editors in Wikipedia have coined an expression for what you appear to be doing; it is called [[WP:COATRACK|"coatrack"]]. Before I commented upon your comment on the [[Talk:Danny Casolaro| Danny Casolaro talkpage]], I checked your other contributions in Wikipedia and found [[Talk:David_Corn|further commentary of yours at David Corn's talkpage]]. Please confine your arguments regarding his sentence structure, syntax, logic, or whatever else you wish to bemoan over there, or on your own talkpage. If you continue to disrupt the [[Danny Casolaro]] article for the purpose of engaging debate in arguments for the purpose of illustrating a point of your own, then I will seek to have you blocked from the [[Danny Casolaro]] article. Wikipedia Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views. [[WP:TPG|(see here)]]. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. [[WP:POINT|(and here)]]. Lastly, the above editors have provided you with excellent welcome messages. I suggest that you take the time to follow their links, to understand what guiding principles are behind Wikipedia editing. —[[User:Hag2|Dixie Brown]] ([[User talk:Hag2|talk]]) 15:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC) |
If you wish to debate elements of logic, go to a philosophy forum. Wikipedia articles are written hopefully to inform, to present factual information. In your arguments against David Corn's grammatical structure and syntax, perhaps you are correct. Whether or not, your arguments about Corn's sentence structure are relevant to the [[Danny Casolaro]] article is not debatable as far as I am concerned. They appear to be disruptive and self-serving. Some editors in Wikipedia have coined an expression for what you appear to be doing; it is called [[WP:COATRACK|"coatrack"]]. Before I commented upon your comment on the [[Talk:Danny Casolaro| Danny Casolaro talkpage]], I checked your other contributions in Wikipedia and found [[Talk:David_Corn|further commentary of yours at David Corn's talkpage]]. Please confine your arguments regarding his sentence structure, syntax, logic, or whatever else you wish to bemoan over there, or on your own talkpage. If you continue to disrupt the [[Danny Casolaro]] article for the purpose of engaging debate in arguments for the purpose of illustrating a point of your own, then I will seek to have you blocked from the [[Danny Casolaro]] article. Wikipedia Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views. [[WP:TPG|(see here)]]. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. [[WP:POINT|(and here)]]. Lastly, the above editors have provided you with excellent welcome messages. I suggest that you take the time to follow their links, to understand what guiding principles are behind Wikipedia editing. —[[User:Hag2|Dixie Brown]] ([[User talk:Hag2|talk]]) 15:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:06, 18 February 2009
|
February 2009
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in Talk:Danny Casolaro, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
This reply uses emotion and attack words, but I don't have time to discuss it
. However, I am going to correct mistakes I made in my prior Cosalora entry.
Casolaro talkpage comment
If you wish to debate elements of logic, go to a philosophy forum. Wikipedia articles are written hopefully to inform, to present factual information. In your arguments against David Corn's grammatical structure and syntax, perhaps you are correct. Whether or not, your arguments about Corn's sentence structure are relevant to the Danny Casolaro article is not debatable as far as I am concerned. They appear to be disruptive and self-serving. Some editors in Wikipedia have coined an expression for what you appear to be doing; it is called "coatrack". Before I commented upon your comment on the Danny Casolaro talkpage, I checked your other contributions in Wikipedia and found further commentary of yours at David Corn's talkpage. Please confine your arguments regarding his sentence structure, syntax, logic, or whatever else you wish to bemoan over there, or on your own talkpage. If you continue to disrupt the Danny Casolaro article for the purpose of engaging debate in arguments for the purpose of illustrating a point of your own, then I will seek to have you blocked from the Danny Casolaro article. Wikipedia Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views. (see here). Please do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. (and here). Lastly, the above editors have provided you with excellent welcome messages. I suggest that you take the time to follow their links, to understand what guiding principles are behind Wikipedia editing. —Dixie Brown (talk) 15:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)