User talk:Samantha555: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Bot: Substing Template:FTF Invitation (Report Errors) |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
== Invitation == |
== Invitation == |
||
{|class="messagebox" |
|||
⚫ | |||
| [[Image:Stub_femminismo.png|35px]] |
|||
| Hello {{PAGENAME}}, thank you for your contributions on articles related to [[Feminism]]. I'd like to invite you to become a part of '''''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies/Feminism Task Force|Feminism Task Force]]''''', a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles dealing with gender studies related articles on Wikipedia. |
|||
If you would like to participate, please visit the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies/Feminism Task Force|Feminism Task Force page]] for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Participants". Thanks! |
|||
⚫ | |||
== Date linking == |
== Date linking == |
Revision as of 19:37, 23 February 2009
|
June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Larkin Grimm. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- The edit history of the article (click here) clearly shows that you were the one who deleted the AfD notice. It's one thing to delete AfD notices, but then to not be truthful about it once you're called on it is quite another. If you are seen as dealing in bad faith, you aremore likely to be blocked. I may disagree with PhilKnight on the deletion of this article, but he's far too experienced at Wikipedia to not know about deleting AfD notices, so don't try to pin this on him. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- I think that Samantha555 is not referring to her removal of the AFD notice, but rather PhilKnight's edit which removed the {{db-band}} tag. As a relatively new user, she may be unaware of the distinction between speedy deletion and Articles for deletion. Michael Slone (talk) 02:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Michael Slone. I am relatively new here, although I have created three other articles that I never had trouble with. I deffiantly do not think I should be blocked, as I never meant to pin anything on anyone. I just meant that a few days ago PhilKnight removed the speedy deletion tag. I thought that was the last I would hear about any problems with this article. If anything I've praised PhilKnight, and if you go to history, you will see he added references to the Larkin Grimm page, as well as the removal of the speedy deletion tag a few days ago, and I thanked him. Samantha555 (talk) 02:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Larkin Grimm
Thanks for starting the Larkin Grimm article. As a Memphian, I very much appreciate the effort and time you put into it, especially considering all that you had to deal with. I hope the whole ordeal didn't throw you off of Wikipedia. Some editors tend to hound specific individuals and demonize the work they're trying to do, which I think violates the Wikipedian ethic altogether. Keep up the good work! Icarus of old (talk) 22:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the kind comment. I by no means leaving Wikipedia. I have contributed a dozen articles thus far and will continue doing so. I never had a problem with creating articles until the Larkin Grimm one. Very odd! Thanks again!! Samantha555 (talk) 01:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token aed0ffc01a49e1bf5366283982ddd4ad
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Invitation
--Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 18:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Date linking
Hi ho, just a heads up, we don't link dates anymore, as you did here. Thanks. --Closedmouth (talk) 06:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
Are you sure ?
Best regards,
--Gloumouth1 17:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Regarding your recent edits to Yemen and United Arab Emirates: please use edit summaries as it helps other editors understand what changes you are making to articles. Thanks. -- Earle Martin [t/c] 03:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Parplar.jpg)
You've uploaded File:Parplar.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
I notice some of your templates on your user page, and I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever to Wikipedia, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.