Talk:Glasgow Warriors: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:07, 25 February 2009

Rugby union Unassessed High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Glasgow warriors badge.png

Image:Glasgow warriors badge.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caledonian Reds

Shouldn't the Caledonian Reds have their own seperate article? The pre-merger team were surely notable, even if they were short-lived. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 00:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, go and ahead and create it.GordyB (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toulouse

Might be nice to mention the Toulouse win. bruce89 (talk) 03:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Shouldn't the Caledonian Reds have their own seperate article? The pre-merger team were surely notable, even if they were short-lived. [[User:Lord Cornwallis|Lord Cornwallis]] ([[User talk:Lord Cornwallis|talk]]) 00:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 :Yes, go and ahead and create it.[[User:GordyB|GordyB]] ([[User talk:GordyB|talk]]) 00:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
+== Toulouse ==
+Might be nice to mention the Toulouse win. [[User:Bruce89|bruce89]] ([[User talk:Bruce89|talk]]) 03:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)