Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 24: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Skier Dude (talk | contribs) →Nilanjana2.jpg: wrong lisc & FuR |
|||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
*'''Question''' - Is a scan of something that was made by someone else for commercial use considered free? ~ '''[[User:JohnnyMrNinja|<font color="#206080">JohnnyMrNinja</font>]]''' 09:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Question''' - Is a scan of something that was made by someone else for commercial use considered free? ~ '''[[User:JohnnyMrNinja|<font color="#206080">JohnnyMrNinja</font>]]''' 09:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
**Yes, if it has "no (or no significant) creative content." Hence the [[:Template:PD-ineligible|PD-ineligible]] template. See [[WP:PD#Non-creative works]]. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;">[[User talk:AjaxSmack|<font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">''' AjaxSmack '''</font>]]</span> 02:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
**Yes, if it has "no (or no significant) creative content." Hence the [[:Template:PD-ineligible|PD-ineligible]] template. See [[WP:PD#Non-creative works]]. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;">[[User talk:AjaxSmack|<font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">''' AjaxSmack '''</font>]]</span> 02:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. It adds a great deal to the article. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 20:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:File:Taylorrichards.jpg|Taylorrichards.jpg]]==== |
====[[:File:Taylorrichards.jpg|Taylorrichards.jpg]]==== |
||
Revision as of 20:32, 28 February 2009
February 24
- Orphaned, and kind of unencyclopedic with all the junk food sharing the table with the alarm. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Uneeded and awkward picture; an image of it installed would be better instead of a size comparison with a can of soda. Nate • (chatter) 04:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Redundant smaller, low-quality version of
. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Also I'd like to apologize to the people who's pages got tagged, the Userbox image was replaced before I put this image up for FfD, but I guess it was too soon for Twinkle. Twinkle needs some time to move on. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- No source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Filmwallah2905 (notify | contribs).
- No description for Non-free use media and no source -Thanks. Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 14:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
The "fair use" now states that this is not a screenshot but is "released in the free Press kit as publicity material by the production company Arjoe Entertainment during the release of the film" - thus the license is now incorrect and "fair use" invalid. Skier Dude (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Non-free poster used in three articles, none of which contain any commentary on the poster, thus failing WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 18:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Commentary in Led Zeppelin North American Tour 1977 states that the poster was used to promote Led Zeppelin's twin concerts at Oakland, July 1977.
- Unencyclopedic, just an image of a concert ticket, adds nothing to the article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The stub shows the significance of his band in that it has full (equal) billing at live events, something not true with Buffett's recorded output. — AjaxSmack 22:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. If it was fair use I would probably be against it, but there's no harm using free images for illustration. Stifle (talk) 09:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Question - Is a scan of something that was made by someone else for commercial use considered free? ~ JohnnyMrNinja 09:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, if it has "no (or no significant) creative content." Hence the PD-ineligible template. See WP:PD#Non-creative works. — AjaxSmack 02:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. It adds a great deal to the article. Andrewa (talk) 20:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Stan_weller (notify | contribs).
- Used in two different articles with no commentary whatsoever on the image, thus failing WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 19:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Orphaned, intended for Tesla coil, which now has File:Tesla coil 3.svg. JaGatalk 19:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Peace keeper II (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 19:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Non-free screenshot used without any commentary on the scene being depicted. howcheng {chat} 23:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The commentary for the scene reads "Led Zeppelin performing live at the Knebworth Festival in 1979, as shown in the Led Zeppelin DVD". Why is this considered insufficient? Edelmand (talk) 11:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Unnecessary non-free image of people that does not increase reader understanding in any way. howcheng {chat} 23:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The page Knebworth Festival 1979 specifically mentions the band completing a publicity photograph shoot prior to the festival. This is one of the photographs taken at the shoot. It therefore does increase reader's understanding of the event. Edelmand (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Already one non-free image of the band available in the article from the same time period, so no need for a second. howcheng {chat} 23:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
