Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Us Now: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:58, 28 February 2009

Us Now

Film not yet released, has only received trivial mention in a blog and online column. Fails WP:N and WP:MOVIE. Creator and main contributor seem to be spamming other (related) articles with mention of this film; seems like promotional campaign. ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. While I'm not a fan of the spam campaign, the film might be notable. The "online column" reference is the Financial Times. While it's only two paragraphs, the FT does mention that the film will appear at the London International Documentary Film Festival. The blog reference is Fourdocs, a blog put out by Channel 4. That particular blog has the air of one that is professionally written and edited, so I'll give it a bit more weight that I would the average blog. (I don't put much stock in the book reference in the article, as Lulu is a well-know ~~vanity~~ self publisher.) Gsearch does have noise problems, but this did look a bit promising. Eye blog appears to be another professionally edited blog, this one by the print magazine Eye.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Film not yet released, has only received trivial mention in a blog and online column. Fails [[WP:N]] and [[WP:MOVIE]]. Creator and main contributor seem to be spamming other (related) articles with mention of this film; seems like promotional campaign. [[User:ZimZalaBim|<font color="black">Zim</font><font color="darkgreen">'''Zala'''</font><font color="black">Bim</font>]] <sup><font color="black">[[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]]</font></sup> 21:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#228b22" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 22:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Weak keep'''. While I'm not a fan of the spam campaign, the film might be notable. The "online column" reference is the ''Financial Times''. While it's only two paragraphs, the FT does mention that the film will appear at the London International Documentary Film Festival. The blog reference is Fourdocs, a blog put out by Channel 4. That particular blog has the air of one that is professionally written and edited, so I'll give it a bit more weight that I would the average blog. (I don't put much stock in the book reference in the article, as Lulu is a well-know <s>vanity</s> self publisher.) Gsearch does have noise problems, but [http://blog.eyemagazine.com/?p=133 this] did look a bit promising. Eye blog appears to be another professionally edited blog, this one by the print magazine ''Eye''.--[[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#228b22" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 22:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)