User talk:BBiiis08: Difference between revisions
→William M. Branham: reply |
Jakebathman (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
:As long as it fits [[WP:RS]] it should be included. Was it published? Also video interviews or any material by the subjects in their articles should only be used carefully. [[User:BBiiis08|BBiiis08]] ([[User talk:BBiiis08#top|talk]]) 08:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC) |
:As long as it fits [[WP:RS]] it should be included. Was it published? Also video interviews or any material by the subjects in their articles should only be used carefully. [[User:BBiiis08|BBiiis08]] ([[User talk:BBiiis08#top|talk]]) 08:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Notability of [[:K. John Morrow]]== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|left|48px|]]<!-- use [[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]] for YELLOW flag --> A tag has been placed on [[:K. John Morrow]] requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please [[Wikipedia:Notability|see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable]]. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the [[WP:Your first article|guide to writing your first article]]. |
|||
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to the top of the article ('''just below''' the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[Talk:K. John Morrow|the article's talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. |
|||
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|for biographies]], [[WP:WEB|for web sites]], [[WP:BAND|for bands]], or [[WP:CORP|for companies]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn --> --[[User:Jakebathman|Jakebathman]] ([[User talk:Jakebathman|talk]]) 07:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:46, 1 March 2009
Welcome
|
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Delinks
Why are you delinking internal Wiki links to important cases concerning Southern Poverty Law Center and Morris Dees? Wiki policy encourages such links when they are appropriate. Dr. Perfessor (talk) 22:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Schwartz mystery
I have been misunderstood. I am no master at words. Edit what you like. It would be nice to see the whole story. But I haven't the slightest idea how you would verify everyone's statements to get a NPOV. TV shows are edited. I guess you would just show both sides. The Geraldo thing does not interest me. Experiments do. Of course Schwartz is biase about himself. People like to make themselves look good. When it comes to one's self, most people are the same way. Kazuba (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
AN/I
As a courtesy, I need to let you know that I've brought your name up at AN/I as a possible sock puppet. arimareiji (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Typo redirect Rudy G Marn
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rudy G Marn, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rudy G Marn is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rudy G Marn, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
William M. Branham
I would like to include in the section on William Branham's death, a reference to Rev Pearry Green's rebuttal of the details published in some newspapers of the time that quoted Rev Green. I have already provided evidence that news articles were mistaken on at least two accounts (Branham never had a daughter called Marie, and nor were there any other members of his family killed in the car crash). I would also like to include a reference to the interview video with William Branham because it is the most reliable source of the quote used in the article about his encounter with an angel. (This reference was not included as "proof" of a miracle, as you commented - I'm sure all intelligent readers are well aware it is impossible to prove a miracle, especially in these days of camera tricks and such like.) I think it would also be informative for the artcile to include a reference link to to a video of what Branham called his "ministry of discernment" ... again, not as "proof", but to allow the interested reader to see what is being discussed. I would appreciate any help you may be able to provide. Rev107 (talk) 08:08, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- As long as it fits WP:RS it should be included. Was it published? Also video interviews or any material by the subjects in their articles should only be used carefully. BBiiis08 (talk) 08:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Notability of K. John Morrow
A tag has been placed on K. John Morrow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Jakebathman (talk) 07:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)