User talk:General Disarray: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Archiving |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*[[/Archive1]] -January 2006 |
*[[/Archive1]] -January 2006 |
||
*[[/Archive2]] -January 2009 |
*[[/Archive2]] -January 2009 |
||
== CMR.com & CMR.net == |
|||
Can you tell me what the difference is between those two sites? "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published". Both self-published, both written about Mason Remey, both not written by Mason Remey. Regards, -- [[User:Jeff3000|Jeff3000]] ([[User talk:Jeff3000|talk]]) 20:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:If information from either could pass the bar for inclusion based on the 5 points of [[WP:SPS]] then either are valid. If not then the content does not warrant inclusions. Why are you asking me here when it' been asked and answered three times on the discussion page? [[User:General Disarray|<small><sub><font face="cursive" color="Maroon">'''Disarray'''</font></sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left:-33px; margin-right:-33px;"><font face="cursive" color="Purple">General</font></span></sup></small>]] 04:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::It hasn't by you. It's not the content that the point, it's the publisher, because self-published works have no reliable source of fact-checking and thus it's out. In wikipedia, users don't get to decide what is truth, but what is verifiable, and they way to decide if it's veriable if someone else has decided to publish it. Regards, -- [[User:Jeff3000|Jeff3000]] ([[User talk:Jeff3000|talk]]) 13:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Apparently Jeff gets off on lecturing people about "the way it is", but hasn't derived enough satisfaction from doing so in our discussion elsewhere, so now I must endure it here as well. What a tragedy it must be to endure such a meaningless existence. I can only imagine what the people in his real life must endure. |
|||
Revision as of 20:23, 2 March 2009
I archive all resolved issues, and reserve this space for current exchanges of ideas.