Talk:Judiciary of Germany: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 139.133.7.37 - "" |
Start-class for WP Germany |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Germany|class=Start}} |
|||
This article was cited by Harvard Law Review, however, it was copy and pasted from the Library of Congress' country studies work. [[User:Lotsofissues|Lotsofissues]] 04:03, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC |
This article was cited by Harvard Law Review, however, it was copy and pasted from the Library of Congress' country studies work. [[User:Lotsofissues|Lotsofissues]] 04:03, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC |
||
Revision as of 13:22, 3 March 2009
Germany Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
This article was cited by Harvard Law Review, however, it was copy and pasted from the Library of Congress' country studies work. Lotsofissues 04:03, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC
It's surprising that this information comes from the Library of Congress because it contains a couple of inaccuracies and even one or two outright mistakes. I'll look into correcting these later 0:33, 1 Jun 2005 (CEST)
Done. (I hope :) Hazzl 15:28, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The part on specialized courts is incorrect as it states: “In these courts, individuals can seek compensation from the government for any harm caused by incorrect administrative actions by officials.“ Generally such a compensation is sought in the ordinary courts, see section 40 Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung (Rules of the Administrative Courts). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.133.7.37 (talk) 14:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)