User talk:142.163.60.14: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:25, 3 March 2009

Attention:

This IP address, 142.163.60.14, is registered to Stentor National Integrated Communications Network. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Your edit to Nuclear warfare

Your recent edit to Nuclear warfare (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Cardiovascular disease has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 12:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Dumb

Your recent edit to Dumb (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dumb, you will be blocked from editing. Nihilon 14:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dumb, you will be blocked from editing.

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 99 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --May the Force be with you! Shre shth91 14:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pipes of Peace. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion _(talk) 12:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Passover, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Tivedshambo _(t|c) 12:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mi'kmaq. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —LOL (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Grand Falls-Windsor, Newfoundland and Labrador has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 17:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Grand Falls-Windsor, Newfoundland and Labrador constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 17:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Grand Falls-Windsor, Newfoundland and Labrador. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Abrech (talk) 17:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Grand Falls-Windsor, Newfoundland and Labrador. Abrech (talk) 17:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Gonorrhea has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Loren.wilton (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Michael Ryder. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tlesher (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2008

Your recent edit to Literature (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 12:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Hadith, you will be blocked from editing. 1 Peter Deer (talk) 13:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Haiti, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 11:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, like this edit to Battle of Vimy Ridge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Opium has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 13:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Internment has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shirulashem (talk) 13:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Lobster trap has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 [[Image:Information.png|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment?diff=246495074 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:Internment]] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. You may also wish to read the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction to editing]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> [[User:Shirulashem|Shirulashem]] ([[User talk:Shirulashem|talk]]) 13:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
+== March 2009 ==
+[[Image:Information.png|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobster_trap?diff=274721340 recent edit]</span> you made to the page [[:Lobster trap]] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. You may also wish to read the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction to editing]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 17:25, 3 March 2009 (UTC)