Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Silmel: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Silverstein in Melbourne: Oppose |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''Support as nominator''' --[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 12:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Support as nominator''' --[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 12:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''Oppose'''. Not really suitable as a portrait, as you can't even see his face. Great shot, but not a particularly high encyclopedic value. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose'''. Not really suitable as a portrait, as you can't even see his face. Great shot, but not a particularly high encyclopedic value. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 17:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''Oppose''' per J Milburn. [[User:Fletcher|Fletcher]] ([[User talk:Fletcher|talk]]) 23:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
Revision as of 23:01, 3 March 2009
- Reason
- possibly the best band photograph I've ever taken, slightly cropped from the original for effect. That kid just so makes that shot.
- Articles this image appears in
- Silverstein (band)
- Creator
- Wehwalt
- Support as nominator --Wehwalt (talk) 12:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not really suitable as a portrait, as you can't even see his face. Great shot, but not a particularly high encyclopedic value. J Milburn (talk) 17:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per J Milburn. Fletcher (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)