User talk:Lil-unique1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:44, 5 March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Fantasy Ride, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 22:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Fantasy Ride. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 22:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Human (Brandy album). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 00:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i did use reliable sources....!

Hi Lil-unique1, I've left a response to your question on my user page -- Marek.69 ^talk 00:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia guidelines, it is not, so don't shoot the messenger. Charmed36 (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the way you edit is unacceptable.

Removing comments on talk pages is vandalism! I you don't like it ignore it, but DO NOT remove edits!
Once again: There are guidelines on Wikipedia to create a uniform appearance for all articles - and Human really should be an example! I like the look of the templates but they do NOT fit the guidelines!

Please, accept his! - Noboyo

first of all... i didnt remove comments from the talk page. atleast not deliberately altho i did add a reply.
secondly guidelines are exactly what they say... they are GUIDES!!! to writing a good article not NECESSARILY the exact way of doing it. There is nothing wrong with the table format. I've monitored your handling of the Brandy page for the last month or so and you have been consistantly heavy handed.
you have undone changes by numerous wiki editors. the article does not belong to you, wikipedia is for the public to use and therefore i should be able to make edits like anyone else. if wiki has a problem with the table format for tracklistings then it would not allow them at all. many albums have them, you have even agreed that you like the template. what's the problem then?
you just dont want to accept the edit because it wasnt done by you, you cant accept that another user had a good idea for an article.

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 # Once again: There are guidelines on Wikipedia to create a uniform appearance for all articles - and ''[[Human (Brandy album)|Human]]'' really should be an example! I like the look of the templates but they do '''NOT''' fit the guidelines!
 Please, accept his! - [[User:Noboyo|Noboyo]]
+#first of all... i didnt remove comments from the talk page. atleast not deliberately altho i did add a reply.
+#secondly guidelines are exactly what they say... they are GUIDES!!! to writing a good article not NECESSARILY the exact way of doing it. There is nothing wrong with the table format. I've monitored your handling of the Brandy page for the last month or so and you have been consistantly heavy handed.
+#you have undone changes by numerous wiki editors. the article does not belong to you, wikipedia is for the public to use and therefore i should be able to make edits like anyone else. if wiki has a problem with the table format for tracklistings then it would not allow them at all. many albums have them, you have even agreed that you like the template. what's the problem then?
+#you just dont want to accept the edit because it wasnt done by you, you cant accept that another user had a good idea for an article.