Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Michael O'Connor: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:17, 10 March 2009

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. X clamation point 00:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Michael O'Connor

Please see discussion here. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 20:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable and very promotional.--Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 20:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Author has not even tried to establish notability. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete The books are mostly in many hundreds of libraries (, but I cannot tell what role he may have had in them, as his coauthors seem to be much more notable than he is. DGG (talk) 01:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete spammy Chzz ► 16:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

certainly true, and doesn't help the article, but not a reason for deletion. If that were the only problem, we could edit the spam. DGG (talk) 01:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I don’t think this is a WP:PROF notability case. Perhaps WP:NB criterion #1, but even there it is not clear cut. Media coverage of the subject is difficult to come by, and certainly is not even close to that of some of his co-authors, as noted by DGG.--Eric Yurken (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''delete'''. [[User:X!|<span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica;color:steelblue;">'''X'''</span>]][[User talk:X!|<span style="color:steelblue;"><small>clamation point</small></span>]] 00:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 ===[[Dr Michael O'Connor]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Michael O'Connor}}</ul></div>
 :{{la|Dr Michael O'Connor}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Dr Michael O'Connor|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Michael O&#39;Connor]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Michael O&#39;Connor|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 March 5#{{anchorencode:Dr Michael O'Connor}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 13: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Weak delete'''. I don’t think this is a [[WP:PROF]] notability case. Perhaps [[WP:NB]] criterion #1, but even there it is not clear cut. Media coverage of the subject is difficult to come by, and certainly is not even close to that of some of his co-authors, as noted by DGG.--[[User:Eric Yurken|Eric Yurken]] ([[User talk:Eric Yurken|talk]]) 18:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>