Talk:Ex-ante: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→extremely high level of expertise is implied: new section |
MartinGugino (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The tone of this paragraph sets off alarm bells for me. I hope someone who understands this matter happens along and re-writes this -- or gets rid of it! |
The tone of this paragraph sets off alarm bells for me. I hope someone who understands this matter happens along and re-writes this -- or gets rid of it! |
||
-[[Special:Contributions/69.87.199.130|69.87.199.130]] ([[User talk:69.87.199.130|talk]]) 03:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC) |
-[[Special:Contributions/69.87.199.130|69.87.199.130]] ([[User talk:69.87.199.130|talk]]) 03:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
I agree. This paragraph is borderline bizarre and jumble. ([[User:MartinGugino | Martin]] | <small>[[User_talk:MartinGugino | talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MartinGugino|contribs]] </small> 16:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)) |
Revision as of 16:18, 14 March 2009
before, at, after the event?
then what are the phrase for at the event & after the event? Jackzhp (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
extremely high level of expertise is implied
"Another example of the use of the term ex-ante is in the recruitment industry: Ex-ante is often used when forecasting resource requirements on large future projects. When the word ex-ante is used in this context, an extremely high level of expertise is implied..."
The tone of this paragraph sets off alarm bells for me. I hope someone who understands this matter happens along and re-writes this -- or gets rid of it! -69.87.199.130 (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree. This paragraph is borderline bizarre and jumble. ( Martin | talk • contribs 16:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC))