Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elements of Interaction: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate
Line 12: Line 12:
<hr style="width:50%;"/>
<hr style="width:50%;"/>
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*'''Delete'''. I'm going with synthesis of information. --[[User:Dennisthe2|'''<span style="background:Orange;color:Black">Dennis The Tiger</span>''']] ([[User talk:Dennisthe2|Rawr]] and [[Special:Contributions/Dennisthe2|stuff]]) 00:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:18, 15 March 2009

Elements of Interaction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A piece of chaotic original research, probably from the single real refernce, a dr. Wendy Guess. The rest of refs listed have no relation to the article text. - 7-bubёn >t 03:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brontosaurus: thin at both ends, much thicker in the middle.
  • Speedy delete. Not only original research, but also:

    Elements of Interaction Model was developed to describe the essential and critical elements that should be present in all successful, healthy interaction.

    The Elements of Interaction Model, developed by Dr. Wendy Guess, is based upon the construct that there are universal aspects in common with all forms of interaction. These elements, when utilized correctly will promote healthy and successful communication between parties.


    a vague and uninformative Elk Theory that is totally and irredeemably confused. "References" to general textbooks on sociology are not helpful. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, by wikipedia rules, Elk Theories are not speedable. - 7-bubёn >t 15:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks like a hoax. As far as I can tell, none of the "references" mentions either the theory or Dr. Wendy Guest. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wow. How did we manage to link dancing with police interrogation? I'd say this article reeks of original research, not to mention that the context is too vague to even tell me anything useful about it past a dictionary definition. Delete. Matt (talk) 00:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Pretty far out there. Reapply when reliable sources actually mention the theory model. – 74  00:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]