Talk:833A: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Cleaned up my arlier comments |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Jimgeorge|Jimgeorge]] ([[User talk:Jimgeorge|talk]]) 08:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Jimgeorge|Jimgeorge]] ([[User talk:Jimgeorge|talk]]) 08:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
==Internal construction== |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Armstrong1113149 |
|||
Removed romantic tone identified by Jimgeorge |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
* type and placement of the getter |
* type and placement of the getter |
||
* construction of the anode |
* construction of the anode |
||
* Filament and grid design (a picture of the internals would be especially useful) |
* Filament and grid design (a picture of the internals would be especially useful)[[User:Armstrong1113149|Armstrong1113149]] ([[User talk:Armstrong1113149|talk]]) 02:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
==History== |
|||
For history: |
|||
It would be good to know: |
|||
* Who was the first company to manufacture this tube (RCA assumed) |
* Who was the first company to manufacture this tube (RCA assumed) |
||
* when[[User:Armstrong1113149|Armstrong1113149]] ([[User talk:Armstrong1113149|talk]]) 02:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
* when |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 02:28, 16 March 2009
We could use a less "romantic" tone, with less personal opinion, when describing a vacuum tube.
Jimgeorge (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Removed romantic tone identified by Jimgeorge Armstrong1113149 (talk) 02:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Internal construction
It would be good to know:
- type and placement of the getter
- construction of the anode
- Filament and grid design (a picture of the internals would be especially useful)Armstrong1113149 (talk) 02:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
History
It would be good to know:
- Who was the first company to manufacture this tube (RCA assumed)
- whenArmstrong1113149 (talk) 02:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)