Jump to content

Ordinal analysis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
References: add "See also" section
Line 48: Line 48:
Most theories capable of describing the power set of the natural numbers have proof theoretic ordinals
Most theories capable of describing the power set of the natural numbers have proof theoretic ordinals
that are (as of 2008) so large that no explicit combinatorial description has yet been given. This includes [[second order arithmetic]] and set theories with powersets. (Kripke-Platek set theory mentioned above is a weak set theory without power sets.)
that are (as of 2008) so large that no explicit combinatorial description has yet been given. This includes [[second order arithmetic]] and set theories with powersets. (Kripke-Platek set theory mentioned above is a weak set theory without power sets.)

==See also==
*[[equiconsistency]]
*[[large cardinal property]]


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 01:01, 17 March 2009

In proof theory, ordinal analysis assigns ordinals (often large countable ordinals) to mathematical theories as a measure of their strength. The field was formed when Gerhard Gentzen used cut elimination to prove, in modern terms, that the proof theoretic ordinal of Peano arithmetic is ε0.

Definition

Ordinal analysis concerns true, effective (recursive) theories that can interpret a sufficient portion of arithmetic to make statements about ordinal notations. The proof theoretic ordinal of such a theory is the smallest recursive ordinal that the theory cannot prove is well founded — the supremum of all ordinals for which there exists a notation in Kleene's sense such that proves that is an ordinal notation. Equivalently, it is the supremum of all ordinals such that there exists a recursive relation on (the set of natural numbers) which well-orders it with ordinal and such that proves transfinite induction of arithmetical statements for .

The existence of any recursive ordinal which the theory fails to prove is well ordered follows from the bounding theorem, as the set of natural numbers which an effective theory proves to be ordinal notations is a set (see Hyperarithmetical theory). Thus the proof theoretic ordinal of a theory will always be a countable ordinal less than the Church-Kleene ordinal .

In practice, the proof theoretic ordinal of a theory is a good measure of the strength of a theory. If theories have the same proof theoretic ordinal they are often equiconsistent, and if one theory has a larger proof theoretic ordinal than another it can often prove the consistency of the second theory.

Examples

Theories with proof theoretic ordinal ω2

  • , rudimentary function arithmetic.
  • (arithmetic with induction on predicates) without any axiom asserting that exponentiation is total.

Theories with proof theoretic ordinal ω3

  • , elementary function arithmetic.
  • (arithmetic with induction on predicates) augmented by an axiom asserting that exponentiation is total.

Theories with proof theoretic ordinal ωn

  • or augmented by an axiom ensuring that each element of the nth level of the Grzegorczyk hierarchy is total.

Theories with proof theoretic ordinal ωω

Theories with proof theoretic ordinal ε0

Theories with proof theoretic ordinal the Feferman-Schütte ordinal Γ0

This ordinal is sometimes considered to be the upper limit for "predicative" theories.

Theories with proof theoretic ordinal the Bachmann-Howard ordinal

Theories with larger proof theoretic ordinals

  • , Π11 comprehension has a rather large proof theoretic ordinal, which was described by Takeuti in terms of "ordinal diagrams", and which is bounded by ψ0ω) in Buchholz's notation. It is also the ordinal of , the theory of finitely iterated inductive definitions.
  • KPM, an extension of Kripke-Platek set theory, has a very large proof theoretic ordinal, which was described by Rathjen (1990).

Most theories capable of describing the power set of the natural numbers have proof theoretic ordinals that are (as of 2008) so large that no explicit combinatorial description has yet been given. This includes second order arithmetic and set theories with powersets. (Kripke-Platek set theory mentioned above is a weak set theory without power sets.)

See also

References

  • Buchholz, W.; Feferman, S.; Pohlers, W.; Sieg, W. (1981), Iterated inductive definitions and sub-systems of analysis, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 897, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/BFb0091894, ISBN 978-3-540-11170-2
  • Pohlers, Wolfram (1989), Proof theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1407, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-51842-8, MR1026933
  • Pohlers, Wolfram (1998), "Set Theory and Second Order Number Theory", Handbook of Proof Theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 137, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V., pp. 210–335, ISBN 0-444-89840-9, MR1640328 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |book= ignored (help)
  • Rathjen, Michael (1990), "Ordinal notations based on a weakly Mahlo cardinal.", Arch. Math. Logic, 29 (4): 249–263, MR1062729
  • Rathjen, Michael (2006), "The art of ordinal analysis", International Congress of Mathematicians (PDF), vol. II, Zürich,: Eur. Math. Soc., pp. 45–69, MR2275588{{citation}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  • Rose, H. (1984), Subrecursion. Functions and Hierarchies, Oxford logic guides, vol. 9, Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |middle= ignored (help)
  • Schütte, Kurt (1977), Proof theory, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 225, Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. xii+299, ISBN 3-540-07911-4, MR0505313
  • Takeuti, Gaisi (1987), Proof theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 81 (Second ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., ISBN 0-444-87943-9, MR0882549