Jump to content

User talk:Kyle1278-2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
←Replaced content with 'ghdhffghdfg'
Line 1: Line 1:
ghdhffghdfg
{{User:Andrew Hampe/Templates/Menus/Menu 3}}
{{Usertalkheader}}
{{Statustop|online}}
{{email user}}
{{MsgEmail}}

{{Archive box|[[/March-February|March-February]]
<br>[[/Archive Unwatched|Archive Special]]}}
I have two requests for people coming here:
*If you intend to revert personal attacks could you please use the <nowiki>{{subst:unsigned|user name|date}}</nowiki> template instead.
*If you are here to complain about something I edited could you please tell me the name of the [[Wikipedia:What is an article?|article]] that you are talking about. If you do I will respond but if you don't I will ignore you.

== [[Philip DeFranco]] image ==

I removed it again. Per [[WP:NFCC]] we can only use free images of living people. I just got one for [[KevJumba]] by emailing him. If you want to know how to do that, contact me on my talk page. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 18:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
:Well, you can contact him [http://www.phillyd.tv/contact/ here]. Ask him to send you an email including a photo and the words "I release this image under creative commons attribution 3.0" or "I release this image under the GFDL" or "I release this image into the public domain". Then you upload the image at commons and follow the OTRS instructions at [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS here]. [[User:Cirt]] checked the OTRS for me, he's pretty quick about it. You may want to explain that our rules require a free image, and that his wikipedia article gets [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Philip_DeFranco thousands of hits]. Here's the text of the email I sent to Kevjumba. You can modify it if you want.

::I need you to say in an email reply "I release these images under the GFDL" ,or "I release these images under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported", or "I release these images into the public domain"
::So you know, all of these will allow everyone (including wikipedia) the following three rights to your photos. 1) Modification 2) Redistribution 3) Use for any purpose, including commercial purposes.
::Sometimes people don't like number 3, so you may want to think about it. I know of someone in Australia who was unhappy after releasing an image of themselves. A travel agency used it in an advertisement, which they didn't like. It's really not that big of a deal, since every picture of a living person on wikipedia is there under the same rules, but I just want to be clear becuase the licenses are irrevocable.
::The difference between the three is that the GFDL is for Linux geeks, the creative commons one is the one that some Flickr images come under, and public domain doesn't require a note saying that the image came from you, unlike the first two. I recommend the creative commons one myself, but choose whichever you like.
:Good luck. It's kind of a pain in the ass, but once you get the image, no one will ever remove it, which is pretty cool. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 20:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
::No problem. I forgot to say, there are (too) detailed instructions at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images]] and too ask Cirt on his user page to check it after you upload the image. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 20:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

== Look at my artice. ==

They said it should be deleted but why? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:IceRules|IceRules]] ([[User talk:IceRules|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/IceRules|contribs]]) 22:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->



--[[User:IceRules|IceRules]] ([[User talk:IceRules|talk]]) 22:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

==Orphaned non-free media (File:Sxephil.jpg)==
[[Image:Ambox warning blue.svg|25px]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Sxephil.jpg]]'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, it is currently [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Orphanage|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 05:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Kyle,

I'm new to this. I want to state that it was not blatant advertising. I wanted to place it under the wiki news but ended up here. I'm not in any way associated with FIFA or Ticketing for this. I'm just trying to get my hands and feet wet in to the world of wiki. Just wanted to clarify this.

Thanks
Ganesh <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gvenkat5|Gvenkat5]] ([[User talk:Gvenkat5|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gvenkat5|contribs]]) 00:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Fort Simpson, Northwest Territories==
Just wanted to let you know that if you use {{tl|clear}} like [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Fort_Simpson%2C_Northwest_Territories&diff=274370843&oldid=274336209 this] you get the same effect as the multiple lines. The other advantage is that [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cape_Dorset%2C_Nunavut&diff=273061432&oldid=272422500 this] does not happen. One of the automatic edits made by [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser]] is to remove all the empty lines which spoils the page but may not be noticed by the person using it. Cheers. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CambridgeBayWeather,]] [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|waits for audience applause,]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|not a sausage]] 07:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

== List of mayors of Edmonton ==

Thanks for your work on that list. Unfortunately, I've had to remove the image of William Hawrelak, as it was not free and I don't see the image's use there are being compliant with [[WP:NFCC|Wikipedia's non-free content policy]]. If you'd like to further illustrate the article, all of the free images of Edmonton's mayors that I'm aware of can be found in [[Commons:Category:Mayors of Edmonton]]. Cheers, [[User:Sarcasticidealist|Sarcasticidealist]] ([[User talk:Sarcasticidealist|talk]]) 18:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

== File:Edmontonmillwoodswind.jpg listed for deletion ==
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Edmontonmillwoodswind.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 4#Edmontonmillwoodswind.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> '''[[User:seresin|seresin]]&nbsp;(&nbsp;[[User talk:Seresin|¡?]]&nbsp;)&nbsp;''' 01:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

==Rationale==
According to your rationale, that "you have to it needs more than just one soure it needs several. being shown once in one article dose not estsbish it notability", List of Internet phenomena would go from looking like [[List of Internet phenomena|this]] to looking like [[User:MelicansMatkin/Sandbox|this]]. I've removed all of the phenomena that have either one source, or no sources at all. Only the ones that have "more than just one source" have been kept in this sandbox edit.

Incidentally, many of the ones I removed shared the same source; just like the Mudkip one you removed. Double standards much? You can't have it both ways. Please explain your rationale in regards to my editing to the standards you have set. [[User:MelicansMatkin|MelicansMatkin]] ([[User talk:MelicansMatkin|talk]]) 01:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
::the source you provided is not nearly enough to establish notability it just because the other stuff on the page has one soure listed dose not mean they do not have more the have been discussed and came to the conclusion that they were notable you just added it with out any attempt at a discussion of providing sources just a little mention in a broad article is far from enough to be added. [[User:Kyle1278|Kyle1278]] ([[User talk:Kyle1278#top|talk]]) 01:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:::Last I checked there was no policy stating that every edit made to Wikipedia had to be discussed beforehand. There is also no policy that states more than one source is needed for material to eb included. I was [[WP:BOLD|bold]] and added the information because it is clearly an internet phenomena, and proven to be notable thanks to it being discussed by a reputable and [[WP:RS|reliable]] source such as Wall Street Journal. The point stands that according to the rationale you provided, the content on the page would be almost halved (from 49 000+ bytes to just over 26 000). There were five or six items that I removed in my demonstrative edit that shared one source as their only verification; clearly none of those would have been given much more discussion than the WSJ mnetion did. [[User:MelicansMatkin|MelicansMatkin]] ([[User talk:MelicansMatkin|talk]]) 01:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
::::Read the top of the talk page on there the policy's is a bit different and the article you supplied does not fit that policy Google hits and popular on the internet dose not make it notable the one source you provided is not enough if you can find more and talk about it on the talk page then sure it can go up but in till then it can not. [[User:Kyle1278|Kyle1278]] ([[User talk:Kyle1278#top|talk]]) 02:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::What? The [[Wall Street Journal]] isn't just a throwaway Google source. It's an international daily newspaper with a readership graeter than 2 million. How can the Wall Street Journal possibly be seen as unnotable? I'm genuinely confused about that. [[User:MelicansMatkin|MelicansMatkin]] ([[User talk:MelicansMatkin|talk]]) 02:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::: I never said that the Wall Street Journal is not reliable it the size of the article in it dose not pass as notability if you look at other links in the article the whole source is about the phenomena not like yours where its also about 4chan and other things and if you notice on the talk page it says reliable sources it mean there needs to be more than one. I'am not doing this to just target you i'm just trying to keep the article notable. [[User:Kyle1278|Kyle1278]] ([[User talk:Kyle1278#top|talk]]) 02:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I understand that you're not trying to target me, and I apologize if my posts are giving the impression that I feel that way. I also understand that you're just trying to keep the article as free from crap as possible. But there are still phenomena mentioned that don't have any sources at all. [http://pcworld.co.nz/pcworld/pcw.nsf/web/NT0005B0C2 This article] is used to source no less than 12 different phenomena in the article, making it similar to the citation I have provided. [[User:MelicansMatkin|MelicansMatkin]] ([[User talk:MelicansMatkin|talk]]) 02:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
*Notability does not govern article content, and is therefore irrelevant here. Verifiability and NPOV are the major concerns for article content, and there are no such problems here. You are at 3RR on this article &ndash; do not revert again. Also, please punctuate properly. It facilitates intelligent discussion. '''[[User:seresin|seresin]]&nbsp;(&nbsp;[[User talk:Seresin|¡?]]&nbsp;)&nbsp;''' 02:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:Being the first person Seresin schooled on Notability, he is correct. Notability only governs the creation of articles, not adding to existent ones. -<font color="32CD32">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jeremy]]''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>([[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]] [[Wikipedia:Trading card game|Cardmaker]])</sup></font> 02:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
::Cheers Kyle; you've been a good sport with this discussion, and I apologize again if I came across in the wrong way with the way I worded my posts. [[User:MelicansMatkin|MelicansMatkin]] ([[User talk:MelicansMatkin|talk]]) 02:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
This argument has been discussed before, for example see what seresin says about nine comments down at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_(241-260)/Archive03#.22So_I_herd_u_like_mudkips.22_in_July_9.2C_2008_Wall_Street_Journal.2C_called_a_viral_phenomenon [[User:Habanero-tan|Habanero-tan]] ([[User talk:Habanero-tan|talk]]) 08:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

you deleted my page because and you gave the reason: 'it does not say why it is significant'. i do not see therefore why other band's pages are not deleted, because i used an already existing band's page as a template (no copyrighted material was used). Furthermore, I do not understand fully the purpose of this deletion, because i do not see that significancy is a viable point for speedy deletion. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jworules|Jworules]] ([[User talk:Jworules|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jworules|contribs]]) 22:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Subliminal Noise Deletion ==

My page was put up for 'speedy deletion' by you under article CSD A7. With all due respect, I fail to see how this applies, because I have made myself fully aware of the rules and regulations of wikipedia, and I fail to see also how my page is not significant. If this is the case, and my page is not significant, why are not more band's pages deleted? I fail to see your logic behind your deletion. Sorry to be so blunt, but I truly feel that the suggested deletion was harsh and by the time it took for you to delete it I think (and correct me if I'm wrong) that it would be impossible for you to have read through the article in its entirity. I apologize, as I said, but I do not honestly feel that you are being fair. Please talk back. This is the page in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subliminal_Noise <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jworules|Jworules]] ([[User talk:Jworules|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jworules|contribs]]) 22:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

OK, you have said that the band wikipedia page is up for deletion because it is not notable enough. If this is so, you are suggesting that in this massive online encyclopedia with millions of pages that ALL of them are about successful, notable things. Well, there are not that many things that are as notable as you are suggesting, so I do not see how your argument holds up. [[User:Jworules|Jworules]] ([[User talk:Jworules|talk]]) 22:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

possibly, the bebo page is not a viable source. But surely this internet Encyclopedia would count as a viable source? If you would let us set a wikipedia page up, of course. [[User:Jworules|Jworules]] ([[User talk:Jworules|talk]]) 22:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Aren't we pushing for fairplay and manners on this page? Your comment just then contained neither. Maybe the mods on wikipedia could tell you that aswell. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jworules|Jworules]] ([[User talk:Jworules|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jworules|contribs]]) 22:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

And you are saying that every single page on wikipedia has these sources? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jworules|Jworules]] ([[User talk:Jworules|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jworules|contribs]]) 22:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Yes, that's exactly what every one of the millions of pages are. But it's free to edit, so people like you add stuff that needs to be deleted. Can you help us out by marking the articles that aren't notable for deletion? Thanks. It's a lot of work. [[User:Habanero-tan|Habanero-tan]] ([[User talk:Habanero-tan|talk]]) 21:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

{{tb|kelapstick}}
Hey Kyle, looks like someone figured out the solution to your problem, (it's on my talk page), but it will update as soon as you save a change to the page...--[[User:Kelapstick|kelapstick]] ([[User talk:Kelapstick|talk]]) 23:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

== [[Edmonton]] ==

Hi Kyle, I (and probably we) appreciate all the work you've done on the article. However, using scrolling boxes for the ref section is generally frowned upon, as far as I can tell. For one thing, I'm pretty sure it messes up screen readers for blind people. We have at least one blind editor here that I know of and I'm sure many more who come to this site to learn. While I respect your desire to have the article you've worked so hard on look good, this is the encyclopedia for everyone in the world. Everyone.

Also, 150 footnotes is no big news. It's impressive but by no means record-setting. :) The scrollbox has no effect at all on the page-load time. And if you go to GA again with a scrollbox, I pretty much guarantee you will get a plain old NO. Regards & keep up the good work. [[User:Franamax|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax|talk]]) 00:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

:I understand why you removed it i will not put it back. The reason i put it there is because of the [[Regina, Saskatchewan|Regina]] article i have removed it from there but people still but it back. If you could look into this i would be grateful. [[User:Kyle1278|Kyle1278]] ([[User talk:Kyle1278|talk]]) 01:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
::Yeah, I see what you mean. I've contacted the [[User_talk:Masalai#Regina.2C_Saskatchewan|other editor]] on that topic. Accessibility is one of those issues that often gets overlooked.
::Also, I've refactored this thread to keep it whole on your own talk page, in accordance with my stated preference. Regards! [[User:Franamax|Franamax]] ([[User talk:Franamax|talk]]) 01:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

==Maps==
I put the other map back. It's gives a clearer picture of where the place is in relationship to the rest of Canada. I also left a message on their talk page. Cheers. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|Enter CambridgeBayWeather,]] [[Special:Contributions/CambridgeBayWeather|waits for audience applause,]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|not a sausage]] 23:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

We could sure use a better blank map of Canada which displays the territories. I admit mine was not the best but the infoboxes would look a lot better with a decent blank locator map displaying territory rather than the cluttered colourful one you insist on using. Also in future I would prefer you addressing me directly rather than seemingly telling tales to Cambridge weather, I don't know why you felt as if you couldn't say something to me myself[[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 10:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC).

Don't worry about. Good work on Nunavut anyway. I had wanted to use [[:File:Canada location map.svg]] (my intention) but I didn't know the coordinates. Dutch wikipedia however had an even more disgusting looking lurid yellow map with coordinates which if you see I at least tried to improve it, probably to no avail though. I've requested that the svg map is added and coordinates found. If so it should be a good replacement, Cambridge also seems to agree. Regards. [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 14:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I was actually asked a few months ago to see if I could request some new maps for Canada. I didn't work out but I swore I'd tried to replace some of the ugly silver ones we have on some of the lower areas like Saskatchewan, Manitoba etc. What would look good I think is if we have a decent regional locator and then a national locator underneath, two lovely clear attractive maps to improve things . My only concern would be that it would lengthen the infoboxes a little but I think it might be a considerable improvement in regards to understanding where these places are. Actually though probably the most difficult maps on wikipedia with pins is America. A lot of the maps are very localised and they shouldn't be really, wikipedia is a global website so it should at least try to help people understand places nationally. I always think a regional and national locator go well together but we'll see how it looks. [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I created a few yesterday like [[Template:Location map Canada Manitoba]]. These maps show the internal divisions too which helps I think. [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I know they aren't perfect as I'm not a "professional" map maker like people like Nord are on here but they are certianly an improvement and look decent enough as a pin now. I would like to get hold of a decent map of Nunavut too, perhaps we could eventually get hold of a nice regional locator map for this region. A lot of people tend to neglect this region which I'm very glad editors like you and Cambridge are dedicated to improving. If you ever have any missing article requests, particularly settlements etc let me know and I'll try to generate a few using a map we agree on of course. [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 15:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

[[File:Nunavut location map.png|thumb|right|280px]]

I was thinking of something like the map I created on the right. Major obstacle though is finding the coordinates to make it work. If so I would create a Location map Canada Nunavut asap for us to use. [[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 17:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

== Mistake ==

Oops! My bad! My apologies! --[[User:Mhking|Mhking]] ([[User talk:Mhking|talk]]) 01:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
==Image tagging for File:Canada Vatican City Locator.png==
Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Canada Vatican City Locator.png]]'''. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on [[:File:Canada Vatican City Locator.png|this link]], then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]].

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
* [[Wikipedia:Image use policy]]
* [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]]

Thank you for your cooperation. --[[User:ImageTaggingBot|ImageTaggingBot]] ([[User talk:ImageTaggingBot|talk]]) 19:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


==File copyright problem with File:Canada Benin Locator.png==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|File Copyright problem]]
Thank you for uploading [[:File:Canada Benin Locator.png]]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a '''[[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags|copyright tag]]''' to the [[Help:Image page|image description page]].

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Kyle1278 this link].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|media copyright questions page]]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">neuro</font>]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|<font color="#5A3696">(talk)</font>]]</i></sup></font> 22:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

==Copyright violation==
I haev deleted the article [[Canada-Djibouti relations]] because it was copied from [http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/ethiopia-ethiopie/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/canada_djibouti.aspx?menu_id=78&menu=L]. This website is not public domain but copyrighted, and Wikipedia articles may not consist of copyrighted material. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 16:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I have also deleted a whole bunch of other articles for the same reason. Please don't create any more copyright violating articles. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 16:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

== Rollback ==

{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|Rollbackgiven}}
I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A{{PAGENAME}} granted] rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of ''reverting [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]'', and that you will not abuse it by reverting [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|good-faith]] edits or to [[Wikipedia:Edit war|revert-war]]. For information on rollback, see [[Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback]] and [[Wikipedia:Rollback feature]]. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 16:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
:You're welcome. Good luck with the new tool, &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 16:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

== hello there ==

hello there kyle thankyou for your message, i apologise if i did not fill out box proplerly there seems to be large number of changes from fan who does not want anything on page but promotional info put out by artist, id be grateful for any help not just on this but in general as im always getting lost ...thans again. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Skinnylizzy|Skinnylizzy]] ([[User talk:Skinnylizzy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Skinnylizzy|contribs]]) 18:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I've added <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags in pace of the reverted <nowiki>[Citaion needed]</nowiki> markup. Cheers, [[User:This flag once was red|<b style="color:#000">This flag once was red</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:This flag once was red|<span style="color:#f00">propaganda</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/This flag once was red|deeds]]</sub> 18:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

==Who's The Boss==
I have a reference if you want it, or i could create a table as in other TV series [[Special:Contributions/217.44.100.48|217.44.100.48]] ([[User talk:217.44.100.48|talk]]) 18:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

== London ==

My edits do not appear to be vandalism, please make sure you follow the Wiki guidelines correctly. Those sections are irrelevant and biased.

== apologies ==

i now understand the enormous mistake i made in editing the Conan O'Brien article with false information. as a result i have decided to refrain from further vandalism. furthermore, i will use my expertise in the area of infomercials to contribute more helpful edits to related articles. thank you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/65.185.15.203|65.185.15.203]] ([[User talk:65.185.15.203|talk]]) 20:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Vandalism warning? ==

Er, [[User_talk:Tangent747#March_2009|this]] appears to suggest the recent edit I made to [[cake]] was vandalism that has been reverted. Would that be [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Cake&diff=next&oldid=277483808 this] recent edit? The one that hasn't been reverted and is a restoration of an article that was blanked except for it's first line? Whats up with that? Huggle gone wrong?--[[User:Tangent747|Tangent747]] ([[User talk:Tangent747|talk]]) 20:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

== Notice of report at [[WP:ANI]] ==

Hello, I noticed you nominated several images uploaded by {{user|Einsteinbud}} at [[WP:FfD]]. Just thought I'd let you know I have reported this user at [[WP:AN/I]] in case you were interested in contributing anything to the discussion. <span style="color:#808080">[[User:Kuyabribri|KuyaBriBri]]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">[[User_Talk:Kuyabribri|Talk]]</span></sup> 19:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:32, 17 March 2009

ghdhffghdfg

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kyle1278-2&oldid=277919954"