User:CharlesGillingham/Todo: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
=== [[Conceptual metaphor]] === |
=== [[Conceptual metaphor]] === |
||
#Use my references and examples -- fill it out, make it clear. |
#Use my references and examples -- fill it out, make it clear. |
||
=== [[Functionalism (psychology)]] === |
|||
#Merge into [[functionalism (philosophy of mind)]] |
|||
=== Embodiment articles === |
=== Embodiment articles === |
||
General references: |
General references: |
||
Revision as of 03:03, 18 March 2009
TEST.User:CharlesGillingham/Harvfn
- Pages
- McCorduck, Pamela (2004), Machines Who Think (2nd ed.), Natick, Massachusetts: A. K. Peters, ISBN 1-5688-1205-1
- Templates
- Info
- How many times was a particular Wikipedia article viewed in a particular month? Find out from this site.
Artificial Intelligence
See User:CharlesGillingham/More/AI
copy these out from textbook survey
Provide a down-to-earth example in the second paragraph.
- This could use some copy editing.
- Add more historical information: notably the victory of neats with the work of Judea Pearl and the agent model
- Crevier, p. 254: The scoiecty of mind as scruffy. Great quote from Dennett about the essence of "scruffiness."
Do we also need an article with the the title "Adversarial search"?
- Find a reference
- Write article
- Tie this to the definitions given in the textbook you bought.
See User:CharlesGillingham/AI effect
Fix weird section mentioning "Strong AI". Rename it Chatterbots and the Turing Test And create another Applications of chatterbots
If this ever becomes an article:
Human beings use symbolic processes to solve problems, reason, speak and write, learn and invent. Over the past 45 years, cognitive psychology has built and tested empirical models of these processes as they are used to perform simple tasks and then more complex ones. The models take the form of computer programs that simulate human behaviour,” Herbert A Simon, who is considered the father of AI, has said.The Financial Express, Take The Right Business Decision With The Help Of AI, posted 15 July 2007, retrieved 17 Aug 2007.
Merges
If these truly are the same thing.
Future of AI, Ethics of AI, Strong AI, AI in fiction
- Read last two section of R&N
- Poole and Bowman discuss 'Strong AI vs. Weak AI"
- Hal plays chess; this was an important test of AI technology
- The computer graphics were from the MIT lab.
See notes at Talk:artificial brain
- Add this to Singularity
- In an interview on C-Net, John McCarthy dismissed Kurzweil's singularity as "nonsense" and added "I don't think Kurzweil has any ideas that have any potential to do that."[1] McCarthy has been a leader in artificial intelligence since it's inception, but unlike many of his contemporaries, has been reluctant to make predicitions.
History of artificial intelligence
- Add (referenced) events from History of artificial intelligence
- Add other events from crevier and McCorduck
- Reference existing events
Philosophy of artificial intelligence
- Add section on simulated intelligence vs. real intelligence.
- Add Church-Turing, and call Lucas a refutation of that. Use Von Neumann's quote that's in the timeline of artificial intelligence.
- Add Kurzweil references. Check Kurzweil's date that machines can simulate a brain.
- Give me a better "intelligent agent" definition
- Add my new "working definition"
- Mention winograd and flores.
- Find some legitimate criticism of brain simulation
- Mention that "strong AI" is hard to construe and that some think it has bearing on the Dartmouth proposal.
- Undo this change: [1]
- Additional references (read and use, if you like)
- Minsky, Marvin (Fall 1982), "Why People Think Computers Can't", AI Magazine, vol. 3, no. 4
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - Dreyfus, Hubert; Dreyfus, Stuart (2004), From Socrates to Expert Systems: The Limits and Dangers of Calculative Rationality, University of California, Berkeley
- Reingold, Eyal (2007), Artificial Intelligence Tutorial Review
- Macro VU, Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think? This thing is awesome!
- Reread and finish "psychological assumption". Plough through this book, asshole, so I can finish this article.
- Thought experiment is plagiarized from here; rewrite.
- Mention that "strong AI" is hard to construe and that some think it has bearing on the Dartmouth proposal.
- Find page number for "syntax is insufficient for semantics"
- Look at Hauser 97, p. 1, Hauser 05 p. 8, and Harnad 97 p.1 for more (and better) quotes for the history section.
- Find reference where Searle talks about the "background". (May have to read a lot of Searle to find this ... )
- Check Kurzweil references
How many of these still apply?
- Variations on the test: Define "restricted" vs. "unrestricted".
- More "strengths"
- it shelves philosophical discussions.
- WHAT WAS MY OTHER ONE???
- More "weaknesses"
- Naive interrogators. The fact that we see humans everywhere. need for experts. I think Steiner is your source here.
- Read up on it: especially Stanford encyclopedia. (I can't believe so many people don't get the spirit of the test. They take it way to seriously.)
- Add philosophical background from Haugaland and Dreyfus
- Write empty sections
- Rewrite replies that don't read well.
- Section on Turing's speculations; should include the fact that this is still called the "Turing Method" in England; find a sourcd on that.
Cognitive science
- Use my references and examples -- fill it out, make it clear.
Embodiment articles
General references:
- "Embodied Cognition" in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy
- Six Views of Embodied Cognition
- Interview with Lakoff
- Seems to be about artificial life
- Boston Globe
- Embodied Cognitive Science (Pfeifer's definition)
- Embodied Cognition: a field guide
- How to study the mind: An introduction to embodied cognition Michael L. Anderson
Theory of computation
- Talk page: isn't this really a concept that has solely to do with algorithms, named by Lighthill? Is this really a mathematical concept, or a property of certain algorithms. A reference would be nice.
- Mark as needing references.
- Add text about algorithms that experience combinatorial explosions. Disambiguate and expand.
- Write layman's introduction to the implications of NP-Completeness. This could go in Moore's Law, or in Combinatorial explosion or both.
MOJO Project
Read articles in all the old Mojos and randomly fix up music articles.
Innovation and technological change
Read all articles in these categories:
- Category:Technological change Move down into Innovation
- Category:Science and technology studies Check if any of these belong in Innovation
- Category:Philosophy of technology Check if any of these belong in innovation
- Category:Technology in society ditto
- Category:History of technology
You want to wind up with a reading list based on the sources of these articles.
- Re-Add the illustration.
- Comment at the top of "formulations of the law" probably belongs under "futurists and moore's law."
- Need an opening graphic that shows transistor density but not on a log-log graph. There is data at instructions per second.
- Add section on Sociological and Historical Impact of increasing computer power.
- Make a graph showing transportation speeds, engine horsepower, etc., for comparison.
- Shouldn't it list a larger and more logical set of exponential trends?
Unused References
- Campbell, Jeremy (1989). The Improbable Machine. Simon and Schuster.
- Feigenbaum, Edward A. (1983). The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan's Computer Challenge to the World. Michael Joseph.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|code=ignored (help) - Jon Doyle (1983) "A Society of Mind", CMU Department of Computer Science Tech. Report #127.
- John Markoff, "Brainy Robots Start Stepping Into Daily Life", The New York Times July 18, 2006, Section A, Page 1
- Harvey Newquist, The Brain Makers, Sams Publishing, 1994. ISBN 0-672-30412-0