Talk:Bicycle law in the United States: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m fix typo |
→External links: The first edit |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[copied to here from [[User talk:DeFacto]] for further comment] -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 23:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC) |
[copied to here from [[User talk:DeFacto]] for further comment] -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 23:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bicycle_law&diff=279445625&oldid=278940540 These], which were listed under the heading 'Bibliography' were not referenced in the article, so were nothing more than a collection of external links - which is not what Wikipedia is for. See [[WP:LINKFARM]] -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 23:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:36, 24 March 2009
Cycling Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
External links
I'm at a loss to understand which policies most of the links you removed violated. And yes, I did read the policies links you provided. At least some of the links you removed, and perhaps most of them, do not violate those policies, as I read the policies. If you think the links you removed do violate external link policies, can you be more specific about which links violate which policies? Because right now, all I have is a vague statement that they violate external link policies, which, as far as I can tell, is not even accurate in regards to many of the links that were deleted.. Blue Order (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
[copied to here from User talk:DeFacto for further comment] -- de Facto (talk). 23:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- These, which were listed under the heading 'Bibliography' were not referenced in the article, so were nothing more than a collection of external links - which is not what Wikipedia is for. See WP:LINKFARM -- de Facto (talk). 23:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)