Jump to content

Talk:Bicycle law in the United States: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m fix typo
External links: The first edit
Line 6: Line 6:


[copied to here from [[User talk:DeFacto]] for further comment] -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 23:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
[copied to here from [[User talk:DeFacto]] for further comment] -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 23:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

:[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Bicycle_law&diff=279445625&oldid=278940540 These], which were listed under the heading 'Bibliography' were not referenced in the article, so were nothing more than a collection of external links - which is not what Wikipedia is for. See [[WP:LINKFARM]] -- [[User:DeFacto|de Facto]] ([[User Talk:DeFacto|talk]]). 23:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:36, 24 March 2009

WikiProject iconCycling Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I'm at a loss to understand which policies most of the links you removed violated. And yes, I did read the policies links you provided. At least some of the links you removed, and perhaps most of them, do not violate those policies, as I read the policies. If you think the links you removed do violate external link policies, can you be more specific about which links violate which policies? Because right now, all I have is a vague statement that they violate external link policies, which, as far as I can tell, is not even accurate in regards to many of the links that were deleted.. Blue Order (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[copied to here from User talk:DeFacto for further comment] -- de Facto (talk). 23:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These, which were listed under the heading 'Bibliography' were not referenced in the article, so were nothing more than a collection of external links - which is not what Wikipedia is for. See WP:LINKFARM -- de Facto (talk). 23:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]