User talk:Miacek

This user has a zero tolerance policy towards trolls on Wikipedia.

I have nearly 1,000 pages on my watchlist. I don't have enough time to address all the problems I may spot on Wikipedia. For my own reference, below I'm listing various active and constructive contributors. (Don't be offended if I forgot you! I only quickly skimmed my talk page and watchlist to refresh my memory in drafting this list.)

• Termer (talk · contribs)
• Martintg (talk · contribs)
• Digwuren (talk · contribs)
• Russavia (talk · contribs)
• ScienceApologist (talk · contribs)
• Folantin (talk · contribs)
• Hillock65 (talk · contribs)
• Vecrumba (talk · contribs)
• Moreschi (talk · contribs)
• Checco (talk · contribs)
• Renata3 (talk · contribs)
• Colchicum (talk · contribs)
• C mon (talk · contribs)
• SemBubenny (talk · contribs)
• Alex Bakharev (talk · contribs)
• Piotrus (talk · contribs)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Russian constitutional crisis, 1993

Hi, Miacek! Thanks for the note, but the protection I imposed was basically due to the fact that the revert war was going on (I'm not taking any sides, mind you). Locking up an article is the very first step to stopping that madness. Please try to work out a compromise with DR2006kl while the protection is in effect—I understand the problems you described above, but making just one more good-faith effort to resolve the issue at hand amicably never hurt anyone. If this two-week lock-down leads nowhere, we'll try other methods of resolving this (and if you prefer a different administrator to get involved, please let me know beforehand—I'll step aside). Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:51, March 12, 2009 (UTC)

Ok. The version right now is more or less ok, as I managed to introduce some ref's today and remove some more dubious cn-tagged sentences. I'll just collect information in the meantime, the other user only edits once in a blue moon, so if he presents any different sources & opinions at talk, oh right. If not, I can just ignore him. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 14:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

stop russian parties on base of the preconception to accuse of nationalism or I shall begin too most do with polish party Gnomsovet (talk) 06:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Если Вы хотите продолжать вносить свой вклад здесь, научитесь для начала связывать слова по-английски. Честно говоря, я не понял ни хуя из того, что Вы сейчас сказали, и еще меньше из того, что Вы пытались добавить в статью. Так понятно? Colchicum (talk) 12:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Communist Party of the Russian Federation

Miacek, use talk page of the article to substantiate your opinion. Your reference concerning CPRF ideology become old-fashioned 10 years ago!Nut1917 (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Ху ар ю ;-)? I've substantiated my opinion by giving academic or at least reliable sources. My references are as up-to-date as they were ten years ago. Or would someone argue that the party had again moved to orthodox marxist positions?! Hardly. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 18:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I dislike KPRF, but here you're completely wrong. Do you come from outside Europe? FeelSunny (talk) 16:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I come from Europe and am quite a cosmopolitan. As a (somewhat) political scientist, I'd personally evaluate the party as left-wing nationalist. In fact, the party's program (and ideology) is in many aspects closer to nazism and fascism, also to democratic socialism, than it is to traditional marxism, let alone Western European new left trends (that are all more or less anarchistic).
That the CPRF is not Marxist at all, is shown by various authors I've cited. I wouldn't say I particularly dislike the CPRF. I dislike Marxism and orthodox communism (thus, CPSU) much more.
In short, the party plays on Russian nationalist emotions (every nation has nationalist tendencies), it combines traditional Russian (ultra)nationalist mythology (evil, spiritless, 'rotten' Zapad etc, 'global Zionist conspiracies!') with some post-Marxist demagoguery ('compradorian regime in Russia!'). In general orthodox communism is even worse than nationalism, the former (I mean precisely in theory) being complete nonsense, the latter, well, just ubiquitous emotional crap. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 17:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

If you're a (somewhat) political scientist, consider this to be a field report then from your Russian correspondent. In Russia, party programmes mean nothing. Unfortunately, people got so disappointed after 1990ies that noone beleives no party now. Please beleive me, for I am a sociologist and have a PhD in media analysis.

So no matter what is written there in the KPRF programme, they are neither fascists, nor populists. They are not for or against migration, for example.

However I would argue they are not at all Marxsists. They still are marxists, though, of course, it's not the same as in 19th century. Anyway, ask yourself, who is not a Marxsist in this world since 2008? FeelSunny (talk) 20:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Gnomsovet

I can't do much about the content disputes you are having, and I am sorry I cannot at this time offer myself in a mediator capability due to time constraints. I will, however, give this user a warning regarding unacceptability of copy-paste moves and will monitor his contributions for compliance. As you know, copy-paste moves are unacceptable in that they interfere with GFDL compliance, so continuing to do them without regards to proper procedures qualifies as disruptive editing, which is a blockable offense. On the same note, reverting such disruptive copy-paste moves would be exempt from the 3RR rule. Seeing how the rest of this user's contributions are written in an incomprehensible and illiterate English, I am inclined to classify them as disruptive editing as well, but would advise to seek further input, as the content dispute component is undoubtedly also present in your interactions. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:19, March 16, 2009 (UTC)

No problems with you ==No problems with you

Hi Miacek, I've noticed the ranting going on at Digwuren's talk page in relation to my editing, and I see that you posted there, in that I mentioned your name somewhere. Note, whilst I have mentioned your name at believe you refer to my AE prep page, just know that I don't have anything against you either personally nor as an editor; I believe we are both attuned to why we are here as editors, and don't have a problem in my interactions with yourself, now or in the future. Cheers, --Russavia ^Dialogue 15:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes. A good thing to do is to concentrate on creating new content, keep temporarily away from disputes where an aggressive minority currently holds power (which is why I removed CPRF from my watchlist) and not to intervene too much in topics where you have actually little interest (I have Boris Yeltsin in my watchlist, but won't get involved yet). A new arbitration case is likely to exhaust every participants' energy for months, as did the last Piotrus case. Additionally, it is likely to end with general statements like 'incivility is baaaaad' and 'npov is of vital importance' (d'uh!) and a some of the people involved will get reprimanded. Cheers, --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 15:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

At least some minimal standards of formatting, neutrality and just lay-out must be followed. The article at hand does none of this

Its quite irrational conclusion from ure side - I,m sure u are well established intellectualy to handle the subject about what we are talking hier no doubt about that. Let me enlighten u little bit. This aticle its written by me and was published in scientific journal 3 years ago .Is it possible that editor of the journal was simply too stupid to notice what u have found out?

In estonian wikpedia most of erticles about buddhism have my influence so to speak so whats ure problem because u start on such a nice way our creative conversation .And of course u have to speak estonian at least to understand whats written there or is it ure deep interest what I,m doing hier in english wikipeadia.Just dont get too paranoic let people do their jobb hier.