Jump to content

Talk:Mama Dip's: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Vknott - ""
Vknott (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
good luck!! ([[User:Rachelp87|Rachelp87]] ([[User talk:Rachelp87|talk]]) 19:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC))
good luck!! ([[User:Rachelp87|Rachelp87]] ([[User talk:Rachelp87|talk]]) 19:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC))


Hey Alston- just checking out your wikipedia page you were raving about the other day and it looks amazing, like you said! I would add a bit more detail in each section and list more facts about the restaurant you visit so often so your audience can learn the facts. Regardless, I can see why you eat there once or twice a week, sounds like a great institution and social construction of foodways in Chapel Hill. NICE WORK, girl! <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vknott|Vknott]] ([[User talk:Vknott|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vknott|contribs]]) 04:37, 25 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hey Alston- just checking out your wikipedia page you were raving about the other day and it looks amazing, like you said! I would add a bit more detail in each section and list more facts about the restaurant you visit so often so your audience can learn the facts. Regardless, I can see why you eat there once or twice a week, sounds like a great institution and social construction of foodways in Chapel Hill. NICE WORK, girl! --[[User:Vknott|Vknott]] ([[User talk:Vknott|talk]]) 16:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:16, 25 March 2009

I think overall, the page looks really good! Because Mama Dip's is a restaurant, it might help for you to add photos, in order to give readers more of a visual feel for the cuisine. In the first section I would cut it off after you say they "have an extensive take-home menu" and make the section about merchandise a separate sub-section. Also, I think you should add the external links throughout the article to show your resources and where you received your information (which you can do by clicking on the globe in the "edit" page). You do a great job being neutral and non-biased and include enough descriptive adjectives that it makes it clear you did background research. I do think it would look more professional if you included other internal links. For example, you could mention "southern cooking" and include a link to a wikipedia page related to that, and also perhaps to the mentioning of "Good Morning America", "Chapel Hill", and "The New York Times". In fact, if the food critic you mentioned has his own page, that would be another good way to add authority and professionalism to the article. Overall I think you did a really great job and with a few more links and possibly a photo the page will be perfect.

good luck!! (Rachelp87 (talk) 19:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hey Alston- just checking out your wikipedia page you were raving about the other day and it looks amazing, like you said! I would add a bit more detail in each section and list more facts about the restaurant you visit so often so your audience can learn the facts. Regardless, I can see why you eat there once or twice a week, sounds like a great institution and social construction of foodways in Chapel Hill. NICE WORK, girl! --Vknott (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]