Talk:E-Prime: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
The link "Working with E-Prime - http://www.generalsemantics.org/Education/WEPrime.htm " is dead. |
The link "Working with E-Prime - http://www.generalsemantics.org/Education/WEPrime.htm " is dead. |
||
---- |
|||
As is the "Intro to E-Prime" link now (http://www.generalsemantics.org/Articles/TOBECRIT.HTM). [[User:63.88.178.130|63.88.178.130]] 20:03, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:03, 20 February 2004
An anonymous user wrote:
CORRECTION: the inventor of E-Prime was a student and follower of Alfred Korzybski, Dr. Bourland.
W. Paul Tabaka http://Korzybski.Org
Should the article itself be in E-Prime?
The following sentence doesn't seem E-Prime to me, due to the use of are: There are of course different forms of the verb. --romanm 13:37, 21 Nov 2003 (CET)
- That's now fixed. I mean, er, I fixed that. --Brion
- Fair enough. It was written in E-Prime-Prime, a variant of E-Prime (that I just made up) that omits the pernicious "identity" and "predication" forms but allows the others (in this case, "existence"). —Ashley Y 21:05, Nov 21, 2003 (UTC)
- L. Michael Hall in his Communication magic mentions E-Choice, a variant of E-Prime that seems the same as your E-Prime-Prime. Any knowledge of E-Choice, anybody? Mkoval 20:41, 1 Jan 2004 (UTC)
The link "Working with E-Prime - http://www.generalsemantics.org/Education/WEPrime.htm " is dead.
As is the "Intro to E-Prime" link now (http://www.generalsemantics.org/Articles/TOBECRIT.HTM). 63.88.178.130 20:03, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)