Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 28: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
March 28: China Squad 2005 FIFA World Youth Championship
Line 16: Line 16:
:{{tfdlinks|China Squad 2005 FIFA World Youth Championship}}
:{{tfdlinks|China Squad 2005 FIFA World Youth Championship}}
The general consensus at [[WP:FOOTY]] is that navboxes for youth tournaments are not appropriate. – [[User:PeeJay2K3|Pee]][[User talk:PeeJay2K3|Jay]] 14:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
The general consensus at [[WP:FOOTY]] is that navboxes for youth tournaments are not appropriate. – [[User:PeeJay2K3|Pee]][[User talk:PeeJay2K3|Jay]] 14:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
* <small>Note: This discussion has been included in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Nominations for deletion and page moves|WikiProject Football]]'s list of association football related deletions. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 14:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)</small>


==== [[Template:Adult industry]] ====
==== [[Template:Adult industry]] ====

Revision as of 14:53, 28 March 2009

March 28

Template:China Squad 2005 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The general consensus at WP:FOOTY is that navboxes for youth tournaments are not appropriate. – PeeJay 14:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adult industry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created by a blocked self-promotional user. See this article on YNOT that he wrote about using wikipedia for their own purposes.

See also

Template:Pittsburgh Steelers/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has no value and serves no purpose that I can discern. It is not used by any other pages. Deejayk (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Settlement 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. This is a fork of {{Infobox Settlement}}. If an improvement is needed to a template like {{Infobox Settlement}}, then it should be discussed on its talk page and shouldn't have an identical fork created with an added feature. It goes against the idea of having a standard infobox. —MJCdetroit (yak) 03:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]