Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YNOT News: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:17, 28 March 2009

Promotional article created by a SPA blocked user. All contributions related to YNOT and is a non-notable subject.

Delete Article creator (since blocked due to COI and SP concerns) wrote about creating the article about YNOT in a column posted to the site. Conflict of interest concerns for sure here, along with notability. Nate • (chatter) 07:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:N and/or WP:V - there are no independent references which establish notability. I42 (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:WEB. This INCREDIBLY NOT SAFE FOR WORK reference on the page provides an interesting look into this organisation's aims to "expand the presence of the adult industry on Wikipedia by tenfold". Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as a promotional article with no clear evidence of notability and no independent sources. If this really is a notable organization, I am entirely confident that someone outside the organization will write about it. The author would be well-advised, as I think someone mentioned in his last incarnation, to improve the articles about adult entertainment topics while avoiding writing about himself and his own company. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep
- More sources will be available. LaserVaZer (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SIGNED LaserVaZer (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 * '''Keep'''
 ** More sources will be available. [[User:LaserVaZer|LaserVaZer]] ([[User talk:LaserVaZer|talk]]) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
-** SIGNED [[User:LaserVaZer|LaserVaZer]] ([[User talk:LaserVaZer|talk]]) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
+** SIGNED [[User:LaserVaZer|LaserVaZer]] ([[User talk:LaserVaZer|talk]]) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC) {{spa|LaserVaZer}}