Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YNOT News: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:47, 29 March 2009

YNOT News

Promotional article created by a SPA blocked user. All contributions related to YNOT and is a non-notable subject.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article creator (since blocked due to COI and SP concerns) wrote about creating the article about YNOT in a column posted to the site. Conflict of interest concerns for sure here, along with notability. Nate • (chatter) 07:29, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:N and/or WP:V - there are no independent references which establish notability. I42 (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:WEB. This INCREDIBLY NOT SAFE FOR WORK reference on the page provides an interesting look into this organisation's aims to "expand the presence of the adult industry on Wikipedia by tenfold". Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as a promotional article with no clear evidence of notability and no independent sources. If this really is a notable organization, I am entirely confident that someone outside the organization will write about it. The author would be well-advised, as I think someone mentioned in his last incarnation, to improve the articles about adult entertainment topics while avoiding writing about himself and his own company. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep
- More sources have been added. LaserVaZer (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Regarding "Lankiveil", there is no nudity at the link reference you mentioned. You'll note that tthe website in question contains links to the http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/, not in violation of NSFW principles based upon images, not textual words which are found throughout Wikipedia itself. LaserVaZer (talk) 15:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Mate, there's breasts in the "Scarlett O'Hara" ads, not to mention a lot of extremely suggestive imagery in the other ads. Not to mention that I'm fairly sure that most employers wouldn't see visiting blogs on the subject of pornography and the adult industry as being suitable company time behaviour. I'm not suggesting that the article YNOT News has any unsuitable imagery on it, though. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- SIGNED LaserVaZer (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]
  - Comment The sources added do not appear to be about YNOT News. In fact, I cannot find YNOT News even mentioned at the New York Times blog source or the Inquirer source that you added, though I'm open to the possibility that there's a brief mention that I didn't see. What's needed is articles which have YNOT News as their main subject, and which show how this organization is important, as you may recall my telling you when we were discussing the deletion of Peter Zed, back when your name was User:Sevencraft. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Self-promotional, non-notable, believe sockpuppetry involved.Bevinbell (talk) 18:44, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ** More sources have been added. [[User:LaserVaZer|LaserVaZer]] ([[User talk:LaserVaZer|talk]]) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 ** Regarding "Lankiveil", there is no nudity at the link reference you mentioned.  You'll note that tthe website in question contains links to the http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/, not in violation of NSFW principles based upon images, not textual words which are found throughout Wikipedia itself. [[User:LaserVaZer|LaserVaZer]] ([[User talk:LaserVaZer|talk]]) 15:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
+*** Mate, there's breasts in the "Scarlett O'Hara" ads, not to mention a lot of ''extremely'' suggestive imagery in the other ads.  Not to mention that I'm fairly sure that most employers wouldn't see visiting blogs on the subject of pornography and the adult industry as being suitable company time behaviour.  I'm not suggesting that the article [[YNOT News]] has any unsuitable imagery on it, though.  [[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]])</sup> 02:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC).
 ** SIGNED [[User:LaserVaZer|LaserVaZer]] ([[User talk:LaserVaZer|talk]]) 15:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC) {{spa|LaserVaZer}}
 ***'''Comment''' The sources added do not appear to be about YNOT News.  In fact, I cannot find YNOT News even mentioned at the New York Times blog source or the Inquirer source that you added, though I'm open to the possibility that there's a brief mention that I didn't see.  What's needed is articles which have YNOT News as their main subject, and which show how this organization is important, as you may recall my telling you when we were discussing the deletion of [[Peter Zed]], back when your name was [[User:Sevencraft]]. -[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 16:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)