User talk:76.10.75.168

August 2008

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Pedro Winter page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Douglasr007 (talk) 08:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pedro Winter. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Nsaa (talk) 10:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Metros (talk) 19:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

You know, if you don't tell me what I did wrong, I don't see what I can learn from it.--76.10.75.168 (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

You were disruptive by trying to bait and taunt him. Metros (talk) 02:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

He left me a similar message, and if you look at his archives, he has a long history of baiting and taunting people. I was just trying to humble him a bit.--76.10.75.168 (talk) 03:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

And you don't have to be disruptive and obstinate in order to make a point. Oh wait, yes you do, you're an anonymous "editor". JuJube (talk) 05:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

You're really not helping your case here, friend.--76.10.75.168 (talk) 05:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --VS ^talk 06:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.10.75.168 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well, it's kind of difficult to argue, since you won't tell me exactly what I did wrong. But if this is related to the creation of that new infobox, I did so because the user in question is, in fact, a pedophile, a fact which he publicly admits to. If Wikipedia has a rule protecting people who like to have sex with children, I apologize for my ignorance.

Decline reason:

I see no evidence in that user's contributions of him being what you claim. Besides, the block has expired, so you're welcome to edit constructively. But no vandalising or adding that userbox to people's pages, please. — Spellcast (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Post-rock, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Post-rock was changed by 76.10.75.168 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-29T17:44:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)