Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 March 31: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DFS454 (talk | contribs)
Drumex (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 113: Line 113:
==== [[:File:M v mikeevillanueva.jpg]] ====
==== [[:File:M v mikeevillanueva.jpg]] ====
I doubt that the user has created this image. For one there is no camera details. Second the other image supposedly made by said user is directly from the website , [http://mikeevillanueva.net/Home.php see here]. [[User:DFS454|DFS454]] ([[User talk:DFS454|talk]]) 18:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
I doubt that the user has created this image. For one there is no camera details. Second the other image supposedly made by said user is directly from the website , [http://mikeevillanueva.net/Home.php see here]. [[User:DFS454|DFS454]] ([[User talk:DFS454|talk]]) 18:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

==== [[:File:Dati.gif]] ====
A screen capture of South Park, licensed with public domain. [[User:Drumex|Drumex]] ([[User talk:Drumex|talk]]) 20:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:57, 31 March 2009


Flickr states "All rights reserved" — neuro(talk)(review) 01:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File is listed as creative commons/gfdl, however on the page listed as the source, it says "copyright 2009 HERE". NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 03:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Uploader claims song is public domain in Canada, but based on Wikipedia:Public_domain#Sound_recordings, it might still be covered by copyright in the United States. Radiant chains (talk) 10:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


No CC at source. — neuro(talk)(review) 14:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find information about copyright at source. Is image unfree? I don't know... But, please, don't delete image. This image is very important because it shows the last minutes of the Old World. This image is historically important also! I hope that this image will not be deleted. Thanks. James Michael 1 (talk) 17:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]




Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No GFDL at source. — neuro(talk)(review) 15:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Author/copyright holder unknown, so can't verify that image fulfills the image copyright tag given. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that the user has created this image. For one there is no camera details. Second the other image supposedly made by said user is directly from the website , see here. DFS454 (talk) 18:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A screen capture of South Park, licensed with public domain. Drumex (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]