User:Clawson/Archives/Talk 3

Archives

• Archive 1

---

Request for Arbitration against Copperchair

I've opened a request for arbitration against Copperchair, and I'd appreciate it if you could comment, as you're one of the users I've named as part of Party 2. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 03:50, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

mescaline

no problem. i'll do more when i have time. some are hard to find- if you google syd barrett and mescaline, all you get are out of date mirrors . . .--Heah (talk) 02:54, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Ashida Kim numbers

I won't revert again, but wanted you to at least be aware that the number thing is contentious: the WP style guide only mentions that "many users prefer that numbers less than ten be spelt out" and many places adhere to the "Chicago" style of spelling things out less than 100. Library of Congress. All in all, a very small deal indeed: if this is the only current debate about the infamous Ashida Kim article, we've all come a long way. :) Cheers - Turnstep 01:44, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Copperchair

By the way, just to clear things up, I didn't blank part of his talk page, he did the blanking himself. I did, though, leave the remark that was in its place. I tried to be civil and reasonable with him time and time again as the rule suggests, yet he refused. I probably would have contacted him by email if he listed his email address. The Wookieepedian 04:27, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Well said. The Wookieepedian 04:37, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Request for arbitration accepted

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair has been accepted. Please place any evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair/Evidence. Fred Bauder 19:38, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

My NPOV

I briefly answered your question about the NPOV tag I put on Majestic 12.

You ask "Better yet, would you be willing to propose ways these sections could be better?--" Philip J. Klass blew the lid off MJ-12, and look at what the anti-Klass faction has done to that article. Bubba73 (talk) 00:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

French surrender

Wasn't there a book about that? The last of the Pepsicans? -EDM 03:38, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Edit warring

As it is unacceptable and wrong as to ask The Wookieepedian to keep reverting my edits? Copperchair 07:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Philwelch's RfA

Thanks for supporting my successful RfA. I'll see you around the Star Wars articles. — Phil Welch 03:31, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

National High Points Page

I am not a vandal and I am determined that my changes to this page, all of which I can substantiate, shall stick. Puncak Jaya 5030m my a***! Viewfinder 03:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Unnecessary deletion of the United States commemorative coins category

Hi, I invite you to vote against the unnecessary deletion of the United States commemorative coins category

--Kurthalomieu J. McCool 04:45, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Michael Jackson article

My reason for splitting the article was to reduce the length of the article. It was becoming way to long and a split was well needed. I was also in the process of editing my version of the Michael Jackson article, with more talk about his personal life and controversies. I will save the page and if you have any further disagreements, feel free to make your own edits. But give my version a chance first. Regards, Street walker 07:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

spoilers

OK, I see. That's why I was continuously moving the spoiler warnings above the TOC a while back, as everyone always placed them at the top of the plot summary. But still, you could put the spoiler before the TOC, as the spoiler warning doesn't say: "Everything below this warning contains spoilers." The Wookieepedian 07:19, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

3RR

You have also made 3 reverts to the Michael Jackson article within 24 hrs. One more and I'll report you. Street walker 08:02, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Jackson artice.

Hi

Thanks for the info re:ads on wikipedia.

User:Street walker is at it again at Michael Jackson, and has violated WP:3RR. Can we do something about this guy and his POV pushing? His edits seem to be solely altering Jackson articles to suit his own POV. --KrisW6 08:05, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

I suspect he is getting around the 3rr by logging in anonymously and reverting edits now.