Jump to content

Haken-giri: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Layoffs: "highly" skilled may be overstatement -- can't go back that far without costing jobs
m Layoffs: tweak
Line 43: Line 43:
The problem is especially acute because temporary workers enjoy few of the rights and benefits that protect full-time regular employees. For example, at least half of Japan's non-regular workers are ineligible for unemployment benefits because they have not held their jobs a year or longer.<ref name=NYTJobless/> In many cases, both ''haken'' and short-term contract workers were laid off before the terms of their contracts, but the lack of penalties in the labor laws meant that no redress was available except through civil lawsuits.
The problem is especially acute because temporary workers enjoy few of the rights and benefits that protect full-time regular employees. For example, at least half of Japan's non-regular workers are ineligible for unemployment benefits because they have not held their jobs a year or longer.<ref name=NYTJobless/> In many cases, both ''haken'' and short-term contract workers were laid off before the terms of their contracts, but the lack of penalties in the labor laws meant that no redress was available except through civil lawsuits.


Public interest in the plight of the laid-off workers peaked around the end of 2008, when 500 unemployed and homeless temporary workers converged on a "New Year's ''Haken'' Tent Village" in a park in Central Tokyo. According to the organizing committee, many of the workers were in poor physical condition, and eight were hospitalized with pneumonia.<ref>{{cite web
Public interest in the plight of the laid-off workers peaked around the end of 2008, when 500 unemployed and homeless temporary workers converged on a "New Year's ''Haken'' Tent Village" in a park in central Tokyo. According to the organizing committee, many of the workers were in poor physical condition, and eight were hospitalized with pneumonia.<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.japaninc.com/node/3857
|url=http://www.japaninc.com/node/3857
|title=It takes a village to move a ministry
|title=It takes a village to move a ministry

Revision as of 14:29, 3 April 2009

Haken-giri (派遣切り) is the Japanese term for layoffs of employees dispatched to companies by temporary staffing agencies. In particular, it refers to the wave of layoffs that followed the financial crisis of 2008, which highlighted recent structural changes in the Japanese labor market and prompted calls for reform of the labor laws.

Background

The temporary staffing industry in Japan is regulated by the 1985 Worker Dispatch Law.[1] The original aim of this law was to regulate the extra-legal system of subcontractor personnel dispatching that had become commonplace in the automobile and electronics industries.[2] Designed to allow project-based work and temporary staffing in sectors plagued by shortages of highly skilled workers (e.g., software specialists), the 1985 law limited temporary staffing to a "white list" of 13 occupations. But subsequent revisions steadily expanded its range of application. Notably, the 1999 revision replaced the "white list" with a short "black list" of occupations where temporary staffing remained restricted. This had the effect of opening most of the labor market to the temporary staffing industry.[3] Finally, the 2004 revision removed most of the remaining restrictions on temporary staffing in the manufacturing sector.[4]

The result was an enormous expansion of temporary labor in the Japanese labor market. Between 2000 and 2007, the number of regular employees in Japan declined by about 1.9 million, while the number of nonregular workers increased by about 4.5 million. By 2008, short-term contract and temporary staffing workers had increased from a small percentage to more than 30% of the Japanese labor force.[5]

Layoffs

Estimates of the number of layoffs between October 2008 and March 2009 range from 131,000, according to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare,[6] to 400,000, according to staffing industry associations.[7] The problem is especially acute because temporary workers enjoy few of the rights and benefits that protect full-time regular employees. For example, at least half of Japan's non-regular workers are ineligible for unemployment benefits because they have not held their jobs a year or longer.[6] In many cases, both haken and short-term contract workers were laid off before the terms of their contracts, but the lack of penalties in the labor laws meant that no redress was available except through civil lawsuits.

Public interest in the plight of the laid-off workers peaked around the end of 2008, when 500 unemployed and homeless temporary workers converged on a "New Year's Haken Tent Village" in a park in central Tokyo. According to the organizing committee, many of the workers were in poor physical condition, and eight were hospitalized with pneumonia.[8] In response, some companies rescinded their early layoffs, or at least agreed to allow temporary workers to continue living in company dormitories until the period of their contracts. But the widespread public perception that large corporations had failed to live up to their social responsibilities led to calls for reform of the labor laws. In February, the Tokyo Bar Association issued a 10-point statement calling for reforms such as restoration of the "white list" of skilled occupations, an upper limit on margins levied by staffing agencies, prohibition of dispatching within corporate groups, and stricter penalties for early layoffs.[9]

Notes

  1. ^ "Act for Securing the Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers" (PDF). Japanese Cabinet Secretariat. March, 2007. Retrieved 2009-04-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ Protected Employment Economies, pp. 8-9
  3. ^ Protected Employment Economies, p. 15
  4. ^ "Overview of Revisions to Worker Dispatching Law" (PDF) (in Japanese). Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2004. Retrieved 2009-04-03.
  5. ^ Nariai, Osamu (June 2008). "Problems With Employment". Japan Echo. 35 (3). Retrieved 2009-04-03.
  6. ^ a b Fackler, Martin (February 7, 2009). "In Japan, New Jobless May Lack Safety Net". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-04-13.
  7. ^ "Industry Associations Forecast 400,000 Temporary and Contract Job Losses in Manufacturing" (in Japanese). Asahi Shinbun. January 1, 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-03.
  8. ^ Gaskins, Cory (January 8, 2009). "It takes a village to move a ministry". Japan Inc. Retrieved 2009-04-03.
  9. ^ "Position Statement on Reform of the Worker Dispatch Law" (in Japanese). Tokyo Bar Association. February 9, 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-03.

References