Jump to content

Template talk:Anglican Communion: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Edit war?: fix typo to convay original intent
Line 79: Line 79:
*[[Continuing Anglican movement]] - no objection, already on there
*[[Continuing Anglican movement]] - no objection, already on there
*[[John Wycliffe]] - the grandfather of the English Reformation? BS! They were burning lollards right next to Roman Catholics in the time of Henry VIII. That is a Victorian imagination at work.
*[[John Wycliffe]] - the grandfather of the English Reformation? BS! They were burning lollards right next to Roman Catholics in the time of Henry VIII. That is a Victorian imagination at work.
*[[William Tyndale]] - maybe...to call Tyndale an "Anglican" is a bridge to far. Protestant, yes, Anglican, no.
*[[William Tyndale]] - maybe...to call Tyndale an "Anglican" is a bridge too far. Protestant, yes, Anglican, no.
*[[Hugh Latimer]] - Ridley before latimer and I wouldn't go with Latimer. Both of their importance was exagerated by Foxe.
*[[Hugh Latimer]] - Ridley before latimer and I wouldn't go with Ridley. Both of their importance was exagerated by Foxe.
*[[John Hooper]] - Not an Anglican but a proto-puritan. Like Latimer, most famous for being burned alive.
*[[John Hooper]] - Not an Anglican but a proto-puritan. Like Latimer, most famous for being burned alive.
*[[John Jewel]] - You are wrong, not a martyr but a very important figure. Any objections to adding him?
*[[John Jewel]] - You are wrong, not a martyr but a very important figure. Any objections to adding him?

Revision as of 18:48, 3 April 2009

WikiProject iconChristianity: Anglicanism Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Restored section on Anglican Life to template, per consensus. This is an essential element for understanding what Anglicanism is, and there is no reason it should be missing. I have placed at the top since it makes an effective transition from the generic Background to particularities. Castanea dentata (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No you didn't. You just reverted to an earlier version of the template. Since January 17th - over two months - this version has been the consensus version, as further attempts after that date to acquire feed back dissolved into conversations with myself. I am open to restarting such a discussion. What do you feel should be on here and why? What should be removed? This template mirrors the "Top" priority category for the wikiproject, so changes here will be reflected there as well. -- Secisek (talk) 07:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Secisek as well. Please don't make changes to the template without discussion, because it affects many other things at the same time. Instead, explain what should be here and why, and what should be removed, and then we can discuss it. Tb (talk) 08:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there was a lively discussion, but it was removed. Wyeson 17:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restored essential Anglican topics

There are two versions going on here, an older version and a newer. Unfortunately, the Talk record has been removed.

As I and many others have stated in the past, the problem with Secisek's newer version is that it is not really very Anglican. Distinctly Anglican features have been removed and random Christian ones put up in their place.

I have restored the older template, which holds the following essential Anglican topics that had been removed without any explanation:

In the alternate version, the above Anglican topics were replaced with the following random non-Anglican topics that might be pertinent on the Christianity template:

Wyeson 17:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war?

There is no need for an edit war here. Let's look at these proposals:

Add?

Remove?

The discussion was not lively, nor was it "remove" - it was archived when nobody made a comment for almost two months. I have identified priorites above. Now, pick your battles and let's come to consensus. -- Secisek (talk) 18:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the substance of Secisek's outline. I think that Paul should be dropped, and I do think Donne and Jewel should be added. I think the Rood Screen and Stained Glass are way too specific, but a case could be made for Anglican Chant. Wycliffe, Tyndale, and that lot, should not be here. Tb (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Anglican" navbox?

I would like to hear why this new Template:Anglican template was added, which seems to be a duplication of this one here. The editor who created it then proceeded to replace the long-standing templates with his new one. Such a change requires some explanation. Tb (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's also Template:Anglocommunion duplicating this, and Template:Angloportal which duplicates Template:Anglican Portal. Tb (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Anglican_Communion&oldid=281549098"