Talk:History of the chair: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This article needs it badly. --[[Special:Contributions/123.243.160.204|123.243.160.204]] ([[User talk:123.243.160.204|talk]]) 10:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC) |
This article needs it badly. --[[Special:Contributions/123.243.160.204|123.243.160.204]] ([[User talk:123.243.160.204|talk]]) 10:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
roman chairs |
roman chairs |
||
Revision as of 10:21, 4 April 2009
Referencing
This article needs it badly. --123.243.160.204 (talk) 10:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
roman chairs
Chairs
there was probably two types of chairs used in lullingstone. One had a rounded back which was made out of basket work. We found carvings on tombstones which show this sort of chair was normally occupied by a women. The other type of chair had a straight back but was made out of wood.
Explosm
This page was used in an explosm comic. Just thought i'd pass that along http://www.explosm.net/comics/1128/ Kirby17 (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Roman chairs
I quote from this article: "The characteristic Roman chairs were of marble".
How can a characteristic chair be made of marble? Surely, characteristic chairs were made of wood (some, although more rarely, were of metal). It is the totally uncharacteristic ceremonial chairs of officeholders or bulit-in chairs for officials found in the public venues that might have been made of marble. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)