Jump to content

User talk:Eaglestorm: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Re: WiC: reply
Line 206: Line 206:
:That items has been removed many times because it does not add any value to the list aside from its mention. We cannot just add anything that even has mere mention of SDI. If that doesn't convince you, try talking to [[User:Dual Freq|Dual Freq]]. He's removed WIC a number of times as well.--[[User:Eaglestorm|Eaglestorm]] ([[User talk:Eaglestorm#top|talk]]) 18:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
:That items has been removed many times because it does not add any value to the list aside from its mention. We cannot just add anything that even has mere mention of SDI. If that doesn't convince you, try talking to [[User:Dual Freq|Dual Freq]]. He's removed WIC a number of times as well.--[[User:Eaglestorm|Eaglestorm]] ([[User talk:Eaglestorm#top|talk]]) 18:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
::I'm not debating the merits of removing the mention, as I said, that was your call and I respect it. What I am driving at is that the repeated reintroductions of the material to the article will not end unless that hidden note is modified in such a way as to discourage people from adding the mention. You have not modified the note, and as such will be forced to make further reversions int he future as a result. Just something to think about. Also, since pop culture sections are discouraged by milhist in general, it may be a good idea to start citing the mentions already there. Just something to think about. [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 18:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
::I'm not debating the merits of removing the mention, as I said, that was your call and I respect it. What I am driving at is that the repeated reintroductions of the material to the article will not end unless that hidden note is modified in such a way as to discourage people from adding the mention. You have not modified the note, and as such will be forced to make further reversions int he future as a result. Just something to think about. Also, since pop culture sections are discouraged by milhist in general, it may be a good idea to start citing the mentions already there. Just something to think about. [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 18:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

== About the issue of francis m being an akrho. ==

To eaglestorm:

We the alpha kappa rho dont want any retaliation, if you think francis m is yours then its yours.. everybody know in the eyes of the people who francis m really is, if you think that our notable members is partly yours then go ahead sir... We just want to create our own database here just like what is happening in the outside world. If you think francisM is not ours then let it be in your mind. ask pia magalona and the rest of the late francisM friends.

I dont want to argue people like you, hope this will end up everything about francisM and deletion of any members from our wiki, i dont want to see your name deleting any notable members, me too is monitoring a good fact about the site of our notable members. then just do your job.

Regards,
AKP Flamekeepers, UK

Revision as of 13:16, 4 April 2009

Emmeria is not an article...hence its red link. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 08:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh...never mind. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 08:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sorry about the confusion, the first AfD was a redlinked Emmeria, so I assumed that was what you were talking about. FYI: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Emmeria; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estovakia. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 09:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, if you need help with learning how to use WP tools like WP:TW, let me know. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 09:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Was caught by surprise when that article came out. Eaglestorm (talk) 09:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added this so called page and added "THis page does notexist" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razgriz2 (talkcontribs) 11:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't you got anything else to do besides bug me? In case you forgot to read, Emmeria's already been deleted. To be honest, you're quite annoying. --Eaglestorm (talk) 11:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fansites

Why are you removing Fansites from the Metal Gear page? There are pleanty of articles that show links to fansites. For example, take a look at the Lupin III page. There is no reason to remove links that are labeled as fansites, non at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.161.203.12 (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So what if there are others? It seems you haven't read WP:EL and WP:FANSITE. And you have been warned about this several times, according to your talk page. Not my problem. --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of fictional aircraft in Ace Combat

An editor has nominated List of fictional aircraft in Ace Combat, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional aircraft in Ace Combat and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ace Combat characters

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article List of Ace Combat characters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


deletion

no problem Jimfbleak (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bagets

Okay, I'll move the article to the series title.--Lenticel (talk) 01:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rfa thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA. The Rfa was successful with 64 Support and 1 Neutral. None of this would have happened without your support. I would also like to thank my nominator Wizardman and my sensei/co-nom bibliomaniac15--Lenticel (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More V vandalism

The same IP that keeps vandalising various V pages seems to be continually doing it despite reverts. Douglasnicol (talk) 20:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. I first took note of that guy's edits and did AGF him, but I've watched V:TOMS and TFB, and I know for a fact that the user is deliberately inserting factual errors. He's just as bad as another anon editor in Metal Gear, who has ran afoul of many editors because he kept inserting spam sites and tries to justify it. I hope that V editor gets blocked for a long while. --Eaglestorm (talk) 18:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but i am not used to the wiki jargon your talking about. Razgriz2 (talk) 14:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're talking about. Enlighten me on the "wiki jargon" that confused you. --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vault Teller - The Bank Job

I see that you removed the comment regarding missing credit of the vault teller and possible identity of the actor. Could you comment on your action.

Should the comment be added to the comments section?

Do you know which actor played the vault teller?

Should there be some comment about the vault teller on the page?

Is any part worth keeping?

Hbrown usa (talk) 06:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down

You've made a mistake here, to put it mildly. You may want to check that page history just a little bit closer. — Satori Son 12:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Notability of Lira Luis, the page you suggested for deletion

Please be professional and don't say "...Ms Lira Luis, whoever the hell she is..." To me, a true professional and accomplished editor does not hastily and casually say such things. Only small minds tend to be this vulgar. No wonder you only "have two centavos" which in this day and age is worth NOTHING compared to my "two cents". What is the value of a centavo currency anyway? Nothing. I can give you numerous references to the notability of architect Lira Luis. I created this article as a fan of architecture. Let me ask you this: Are you an architect or have enough credentials to back up your position about an article related to architecture? Please do some research yourself. It appears that your sole basis for notability is if a person is a MOVIE STAR. I used the title as username and the name of the article because it is the most logical and easiest name to remember. If you do a search on "Lira Luis" from the Yahoo! search engine, you will see a lot of articles written ABOUT Ms Luis, and NOT BY her. Most of these articles are by foreign writers. I think the original article I wrote about her was unfairly reported and deleted. It appears as a blatant sabotage against a person by a group who appears to be very jealous of the success of Ms Luis. The persons in question are: You and Blakegripling ph, who conspired to taint the reputation of Ms Luis. Please read these articles that will justify the notability of the achievements of Ms Luis:

http://www.metropolismag.com/cda/story.php?artid=1150 http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1023770461.html http://damnedinblue.blogspot.com/2006/04/architect-lira-luis-and-immortal.html http://www.aiany.org/firms/firm.php?id=1001563 http://archrecord.construction.com/archrecord2/live/OnTheSide/bowwowhaus.asp http://www.target.com/gp/detail.html/602-2332920-3398253?asin=1424300479&afid=yahoosspplp_bmvd&lnm=1424300479%7CFRANKly_Speaking:_It%27s_the_WRIGHT_Way_:_Books&ref=tgt_adv_XSNG1060 http://archrecord.construction.com/archrecord2/work/0502/pod.asp http://www.metropolismag.com/cda/story.php?artid=1051 http://www.planetizen.com/node/14990 http://globalnation.inquirer.net/ofwspotlight/ofwspotlight/view_article.php?article_id=26967 http://goodnewspilipinas.com/wp/?p=865 http://aec.cadalyst.com/aec/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=429618 http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/questex/cadalyst0607/index.php?startid=14 http://aec.cadalyst.com/aec/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=437990&ref=25 www.midglen.com/newsletter/volume9.pdf http://www.jurgita.com/models-id218134.html Liraluis (talk) 04:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Users are allowed to remove comments and warnings from their talk pages per WP:BLANKING. I have reverted your deletion to User talk:Liraluis. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop stalking my userpage Eaglestorm. I wish I am really Lira Luis so I can actually tell you off! Sadly I'm not. As mentioned above I am entitled to remove comments and warnings via the right of WP:Blanking. So there! What is your deal with Ms. Luis anyway that you are going out of your way to defame her? Sorry but I'm a loyal fan and you can do nothing about it. You can abuse your right here in Wikipedia and somehow my articles about her will come out on the web in some form. It may not be on Wikipedia but definitely on the Web! Watch Out for me! You can't stop me now. FanofLiraluis (talk) 21:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The VF-171 is called Nightmare PLUS

And is official...[1]Kronnang Dunn (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:entourage

just letting you know i got your message, but i am not the same ip user who edited that page, I have an account on wikipedia and only use that. Just letting you know and i do know edit tv shows at all especially such shows as entourage. 67.167.180.64 (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yamamoto

Just to let you know, inline external links are a bit frowned upon. If your Japanese is any good, why not translate 'em & post 'em here? (Do me 1 favor. Don't just use babelfish...) TREKphiler hit me ♠ 00:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But what I posted was from the Japanese Wikipedia. How is it 'frowned upon'? My Japanese is not even passable. Hell, I even tracked them down because of Google Translator. --Eaglestorm (talk) 04:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice?

This is Wikipeida The Free Encyclopedia. No Thailand village agha(tr:Ağa). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.235.123.63 (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Overlord

Did I miss something? I feel like I've walked in in the middle.... TREKphiler hit me ♠ 09:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, ignore my last... I've read it. Here's somebody who needs to read the archived discussion on this. (All 10 million KB of it. ;D) I've pointed him to it. Let's see if that gets a better result. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 09:21 & 09:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


not to be rude

not to be rude but are you a Admin for Wikipedia ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razgriz2 (talkcontribs) 13:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iskul Bukol 20 Years After

Hope you don't mind, I nominated it for DYK. :D Shrumster (talk) 10:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Thanks.--Eaglestorm (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Iskul Bukol 20 Years After (Ungasis and Escaleras Adventure)

Updated DYK query On January 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iskul Bukol 20 Years After (Ungasis and Escaleras Adventure), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From: Pepeton

Oh, sorry. I do not know.

loloige

I considered it, but I don't think he's a sock of Truth222. He definitely has an agenda in editing the Arroyo article, but I'm going to assume good faith and treat him as a reasonable person. TheCoffee (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Konpeki no Kantai

Thanks for the offer. Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not very good at Japanese enough to translate the JP counterpart article. And I only know very few users here who are adept at Japanese. Maybe you can ask Kasuga for help. He/She's Japanese, so maybe he can help you. But it may take time for any response to come up. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 18:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll take it under consideration. Thanks.--Eaglestorm (talk) 04:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yamato

Your deleted contents was that moved contents from Yamato class battleship by me.[2] I think Yamato (film) and Space Battleship Yamato suitable here. Because they are more relevant to Japanese battleship Yamato than Yamato class battleship. What do you think?--Bukubku (talk) 08:10, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try talking to climie.ca. because when he revised everything, the film and anime references were struck out as trivia. I don't know why he did.
I added in See also consulting The Land's opinion. Thank you.--Bukubku (talk) 12:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Secaundis and his tagalog talk

English

Sorry but i'm not fluent in english. my english is poor. Secaundis (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an excuse for you to continue typing here. Try Tagalog Wikipedia instead ([[3]]).--Eaglestorm (talk) 13:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TAGALOG

Panget dun eh, ikaw ba gusto mo dun? magalit ka kung nagcontribute ako ng tagalog dito, sa talk page lang ako nagtatagalog! Secaundis (talk) 13:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, why don't you read this (particularly the Good Practice) first instead of ranting your way out? Oh and removing the user warning doesn't help, kid. --Eaglestorm (talk) 04:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, i'll speak in English. Secaundis (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't say it...DO IT! --Eaglestorm (talk) 17:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine (Three Stars and a Sun Commemorative) Barnstar

Three Stars and a Sun Commemorative Barnstar
Eaglestorm, I award you this Philippine Barnstar commemorating the passing of Francis Magalona. It is given in recognition of your tireless efforts to improve the Francis Magalona article, and protect it from vandalism, honoring the memory of "the man from Manila." --Alternativity (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bless the man if his heart and his land are one...Three stars and a sun! -- Francis Magalona (1964 - 2009)

Hello

From the start, I dont like to contribute to the Tagalog Wikipedia, because almost no one read it, so my contributions will not be read. Here in English many filipinos and even foreigners read my contributions in the Santa Maria, Bulacan article, around 100 views everyday compare to only 5 or even 2 in the Tagalog. And all my contributions here are all english! I only speak tagalog in my talkpages and WHEN im talking to Ramz Trinidad bcoz he is not fluent in English either. I cannot say what's in my mind if I speak english (and if its too long). Maybe I could use Taglish? This is Tagalog "ang importante po ay ang mga contributions sa mga articles, not on the talk pages." Please understand me.. Thank you. --Secaundis • (myTalk) • (myContribs) 11:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know that Friendster Links are among the worst links to have on Wikipedia. The links came from an effort that I made a while ago to attempt to reference every group that anyone had ever added to the list. If I could find anything superior to Friendster I did so. I *think* the only thing that I considered inferior to Friendster was listings on alumni.net . Unfortunately, most of the editors to that page are simply people (from IP addresses) who want their fraternity (or much more rarely sorority) listed and don't really care about anything other than that. What I probably should do is comment out the friendster links with the left angle !-- --right angle commenting so that they don't show up any more. Any additional suggestions are welcome. (Also do you want this comment moved back to Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines?) Naraht (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minor characters on Cars (film)

Wanted to give you a heads-up that someone called Edokter is insisting that the Michael Schumacher Ferrari be included. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll see later.--Eaglestorm (talk) 05:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WiC

If you always do what you have always done then you will always get what you have always gotten. If WiC is that unnecessary (and I fail to see how that can be since the game centered rather heavily on the defense of the SDI program, but I do not maintain the page) then state that explicitly in the hidden message or do what I did with the Iowa class and lay out strict and explicit guidelines for inclusion. Otherwise, to answer you historically posed question, it will never end. TomStar81 (Talk) 18:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That items has been removed many times because it does not add any value to the list aside from its mention. We cannot just add anything that even has mere mention of SDI. If that doesn't convince you, try talking to Dual Freq. He's removed WIC a number of times as well.--Eaglestorm (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not debating the merits of removing the mention, as I said, that was your call and I respect it. What I am driving at is that the repeated reintroductions of the material to the article will not end unless that hidden note is modified in such a way as to discourage people from adding the mention. You have not modified the note, and as such will be forced to make further reversions int he future as a result. Just something to think about. Also, since pop culture sections are discouraged by milhist in general, it may be a good idea to start citing the mentions already there. Just something to think about. TomStar81 (Talk) 18:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About the issue of francis m being an akrho.

To eaglestorm:

We the alpha kappa rho dont want any retaliation, if you think francis m is yours then its yours.. everybody know in the eyes of the people who francis m really is, if you think that our notable members is partly yours then go ahead sir... We just want to create our own database here just like what is happening in the outside world. If you think francisM is not ours then let it be in your mind. ask pia magalona and the rest of the late francisM friends.

I dont want to argue people like you, hope this will end up everything about francisM and deletion of any members from our wiki, i dont want to see your name deleting any notable members, me too is monitoring a good fact about the site of our notable members. then just do your job.

Regards, AKP Flamekeepers, UK