Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Javier Solana/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Set record straight. |
m Reverted edits by 68.43.178.68 to last version by SqueakBox |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I have not accused Cumbey of vandalism, except of course on the 2-3 occasions when she did, but never to this article. It is not true that most of the research was done by her, that is pure vanity. She forgot to mention she thinks he is the [[anti-christ]], which is a rather extreme [[NPOV|POV]], [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 16:23, August 21, 2005 (UTC) |
I have not accused Cumbey of vandalism, except of course on the 2-3 occasions when she did, but never to this article. It is not true that most of the research was done by her, that is pure vanity. She forgot to mention she thinks he is the [[anti-christ]], which is a rather extreme [[NPOV|POV]], [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 16:23, August 21, 2005 (UTC) |
||
I, Constance Cumbey, NEVER vandalized the Solana article -- Squeakbox often did. Squeakbox must think he with his Rastafarian insight has mindreading powers. He does not know what I think. All I have said is that "your guess as to the antichrist's identity is as good as mine." However, I do admit to saying Solana could be an educated guess. And he is. Too bad the article failed as article of the week. With the SB stripping of its academic bona fides, it deserved to fail. |
|||
Revision as of 08:26, 13 November 2005
I think this article has recovered from its antichrist believers POV, has lots of nice detail, and has had the input of many people. It covers all the sourced material available about his life, SqueakBox 02:42, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Object. No references, and lead-in is too short. - Mailer Diablo 05:09, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
- Object — no refs. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 18:53, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
- Object. The image Image:Javiersolana.jpg is claimed under fair use. As such, the source or current copyright holder must be provided, and an explanation as to why fair use is justified must be provided for each article that the image is used on. One possible format for fair use justification is provided at Wikipedia:Image description page#Fair use rationale. --Carnildo 09:02, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
- Object This was once an excellent article with references. SqueakBox acting in adulation of rather than fair reporting of Javier Solana removed most meat and references from article. Most of the research was mine, compiled from other internet sources. Basically it is a dumbed down version of what once existed and was treated web-wide as a credible article. Regrettably that is no longer the case and I personally have given up on sharing my vast body of information on Solana with Wikipedia because I am weary of correcting SqueakBox's damage only to have the serious editing labeled "vandalism" by SqueakBox. Good luck to all. I will do my posting from other sites and my own blogspot.User:Cumbey August 21, 2005
I have not accused Cumbey of vandalism, except of course on the 2-3 occasions when she did, but never to this article. It is not true that most of the research was done by her, that is pure vanity. She forgot to mention she thinks he is the anti-christ, which is a rather extreme POV, SqueakBox 16:23, August 21, 2005 (UTC)