User talk:Drsmoo: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==FYI== |
|||
See [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#Per_WP:ARBPIA.2C_User:Drsmoo_in_Gilad_Atzmon]] [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|talk]]) 01:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Editing advice== |
==Editing advice== |
||
This [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGilad_Atzmon&diff=281866935&oldid=281723416 recent talk page] comment is problematic. In my honest opinion, you are being unnecessarily confrontational. Have a look at [[Wikipedia:ARBPIA#Principles]], you should be engaging in a calm, reasonable and courteous discussion in an effort to resolve the disagreement in a dignified fashion, with a constructive and collaborative outlook. Also, note that revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique. If these problems persist then an topic ban could be applied. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 14:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
This [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGilad_Atzmon&diff=281866935&oldid=281723416 recent talk page] comment is problematic. In my honest opinion, you are being unnecessarily confrontational. Have a look at [[Wikipedia:ARBPIA#Principles]], you should be engaging in a calm, reasonable and courteous discussion in an effort to resolve the disagreement in a dignified fashion, with a constructive and collaborative outlook. Also, note that revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique. If these problems persist then an topic ban could be applied. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 14:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:51, 6 April 2009
Editing advice
This recent talk page comment is problematic. In my honest opinion, you are being unnecessarily confrontational. Have a look at Wikipedia:ARBPIA#Principles, you should be engaging in a calm, reasonable and courteous discussion in an effort to resolve the disagreement in a dignified fashion, with a constructive and collaborative outlook. Also, note that revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique. If these problems persist then an topic ban could be applied. PhilKnight (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)