User talk:Drsmoo: Difference between revisions
→your recent edit: new section |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Editing advice== |
==Editing advice== |
||
This [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGilad_Atzmon&diff=281866935&oldid=281723416 recent talk page] comment is problematic. In my honest opinion, you are being unnecessarily confrontational. Have a look at [[Wikipedia:ARBPIA#Principles]], you should be engaging in a calm, reasonable and courteous discussion in an effort to resolve the disagreement in a dignified fashion, with a constructive and collaborative outlook. Also, note that revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique. If these problems persist then an topic ban could be applied. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 14:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
This [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGilad_Atzmon&diff=281866935&oldid=281723416 recent talk page] comment is problematic. In my honest opinion, you are being unnecessarily confrontational. Have a look at [[Wikipedia:ARBPIA#Principles]], you should be engaging in a calm, reasonable and courteous discussion in an effort to resolve the disagreement in a dignified fashion, with a constructive and collaborative outlook. Also, note that revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique. If these problems persist then an topic ban could be applied. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 14:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
== your recent edit == |
|||
please revert this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Israel_Shamir&diff=282228286&oldid=278790065 to israel shamir]. i appreciate the fact that you are taking my suggestions to heart on the atzmon article, but you must know that edit is not only is a blp issue, but also is in violation of the arbpia that you were recently notified of. i am not one who is quick to run off to noticeboards and file reports because it usually only increases the drama and entrenchment. but i'd appreciate if you'd self-revert - that type of statement has no place in the article ''as fact'', and shouldn't be in the lead even attributed. thanks. [[User:untwirl|<font color="green">untwirl</font>]]([[User talk:Untwirl#top|talk]]) 04:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:31, 7 April 2009
Editing advice
This recent talk page comment is problematic. In my honest opinion, you are being unnecessarily confrontational. Have a look at Wikipedia:ARBPIA#Principles, you should be engaging in a calm, reasonable and courteous discussion in an effort to resolve the disagreement in a dignified fashion, with a constructive and collaborative outlook. Also, note that revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique. If these problems persist then an topic ban could be applied. PhilKnight (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
your recent edit
please revert this edit to israel shamir. i appreciate the fact that you are taking my suggestions to heart on the atzmon article, but you must know that edit is not only is a blp issue, but also is in violation of the arbpia that you were recently notified of. i am not one who is quick to run off to noticeboards and file reports because it usually only increases the drama and entrenchment. but i'd appreciate if you'd self-revert - that type of statement has no place in the article as fact, and shouldn't be in the lead even attributed. thanks. untwirl(talk) 04:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)