Jump to content

Talk:Roadkill: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 77.98.252.87 - "Who picks up Roadkill?: "
Line 64: Line 64:
* No it shouldn't. An encyclopedia article is not supposed to be prescriptive. It might make mention of existing practices though, I suppose. [[User:Extenebris|Extenebris]] ([[User talk:Extenebris|talk]]) 13:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
* No it shouldn't. An encyclopedia article is not supposed to be prescriptive. It might make mention of existing practices though, I suppose. [[User:Extenebris|Extenebris]] ([[User talk:Extenebris|talk]]) 13:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


Jeez == "no it shouldn't - WHY? Where in Wikipedia does it say that this? I personally (as someone who drives a LOT) would like to know who cleans this stuff up off the roads? I suppose the logic behind no articles about THE ROAD KILL CAFE (Wyoming) mentioned on QI tonight is that because it's commercial it's not allowed?? What a load of crap. I should be able to pick up an encyclopedia and look up ANYTHING - not just what a self appointed "editor" thinks is relevant!
Jeez == "no it shouldn't - WHY? Where in Wikipedia does it say that this? I personally (as someone who drives a LOT) would like to know who cleans this stuff up off the roads? I suppose the logic behind no articles about THE ROAD KILL CAFE (Wyoming) mentioned on QI tonight is that because it's commercial it's not allowed?? What a load of crap. I should be able to pick up an encyclopedia and look up ANYTHING - not just what a self appointed "editor" thinks is relevant! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/77.98.252.87|77.98.252.87]] ([[User talk:77.98.252.87|talk]]) 22:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Wording ==
== Wording ==

Revision as of 22:28, 8 April 2009

WikiProject iconFood and drink Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

field of study

It is a field of study which has een recorded since 1938. Can this be expanded upon? RickK 22:04 4 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Simmons Society

Has anyone been able to find any ther stuff about the Simmons Society? It has been there since early on in the page's history, and was left by user:cimon avaro. I wasn't able to find an email address for Professor Knutson.Nathanlarson32767 07:44, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Roadkill seagulls

Here on Cape Cod, we periodically get roadkill seagulls. Seagulls open clams and other shellfish by picking them up and dropping them onto hard surfaces (such as rocks and roads) from the air. At times, they have been known to dive through the windshields of cars that come up beneath just as they drop the shell. --FOo 17:52, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Eating roadkill?

Surprised to see nothing about eating roadkill on this page. I might add something later. - FrancisTyers 19:03, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the reference to Tennessee making it illegal to eat roadkill because I found an article that says the opposite.--Nonpareility 19:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

does anyone have information on state roadkill programs to distribute the roadkill? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.213.108 (talk) 16:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 11:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

I requested moving Road faunaRoadkill (currently a redirect) as Roadkill is a much more common name (i.e. 2,500,000 results for Roadkill on Google versus 445 for Road fauna). — -- Reinyday, 21:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

While I acknowledge and understand SatuSuro's concern, I'm afraid the vote is still rather clear.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

STUDY of numbers killed? Call the stats cops now!

One parochial-size survey and its estimated that 26,000,000 cats are killed on US roads annually. Either the methodology is fatally skewed beyond redemption or the extrapolation concepts of the interpreter got too hot. Crap math, crap science, crap citation, crap. This article is full of it and needs a review urgently. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Plutonium27 (talkcontribs) 01:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The Roadkill Chef

Cooking roadkill on BBC3 [1], and in australia [2] -- 172.179.166.54 20:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too many images?

I think we got the idea with the first one or two. Do we really need so many pictures of multilated animals in this article? -Scaeme —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.187.109 (talk) 03:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I have to agree with that. You don't see photos of people shooting other people in the murder articles, or dead people, or such things in other articles. ― LADY GALAXY 21:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Removing all the pics was overkill. What we should have is a few in the article, and a link to a gallery on Commons. I have several pictures I can add, but will add to and create a Commons gallery, including the ones removed here, probably as part of Commons:Category:Dead animals (warning - graphic pictures of dead animals). Carcharoth (talk) 05:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will add the above to a Commons category. Carcharoth (talk) 17:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who picks up Roadkill?

This is a valid question for those who are physically, psychologically and emotionally affected by the sight and smell of a battered mammalian corpse in the street or near a sidewalk.

As far as I can tell it is a citizen's duty to clean up roadkill, and few cities really have the funding or concern to implement a roadkill removal program, aside from an annual street clean. I think the article should touch on the issue of who is responsible for removing dead and dying animals from the roadside. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.60.108 (talk) 22:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez == "no it shouldn't - WHY? Where in Wikipedia does it say that this? I personally (as someone who drives a LOT) would like to know who cleans this stuff up off the roads? I suppose the logic behind no articles about THE ROAD KILL CAFE (Wyoming) mentioned on QI tonight is that because it's commercial it's not allowed?? What a load of crap. I should be able to pick up an encyclopedia and look up ANYTHING - not just what a self appointed "editor" thinks is relevant! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.98.252.87 (talk) 22:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wording

"The animal species most likely to be recorded as a roadkill are mammals."

Mammals are a class (biology), not a species. There is no need to introduce taxonomical hair-splitting into the article, so I've just reworded this so that it sits better with purists like me. Extenebris (talk) 13:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So it is food for something, but if you want to eat a 10 day dead Wombat, then go ahead. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]