Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Anderson: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Eric Anderson]]=== |
===[[Eric Anderson]]=== |
||
The person who is the title of the article is not notable enough to have an article about him, and the rest of the article is advertising. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 04:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC) |
<>The person who is the title of the article is not notable enough to have an article about him, and the rest of the article is advertising. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 04:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC)</s> |
||
*'''Keep'''--there's justified precedent for keeping all winners of the Victoria Cross. [[User:Meelar|Meelar]] [[User talk:Meelar|(talk)]] 04:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''--there's justified precedent for keeping all winners of the Victoria Cross. [[User:Meelar|Meelar]] [[User talk:Meelar|(talk)]] 04:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
Never mind. The version I afd'd was vandalism. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 04:58, 15 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:58, 15 November 2005
<>The person who is the title of the article is not notable enough to have an article about him, and the rest of the article is advertising. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep--there's justified precedent for keeping all winners of the Victoria Cross. Meelar [[User talk:Meelar|(talk)]] 04:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Never mind. The version I afd'd was vandalism. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:58, 15 November 2005 (UTC)