Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 April 14: Difference between revisions
Adding File:Holmeswidesg.jpg |
Adding File:Holmessg.jpg |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
==== [[:File:Holmeswidesg.jpg]] ==== |
==== [[:File:Holmeswidesg.jpg]] ==== |
||
Reportedly self-made, but appears to be a software screenshot – [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]])</sup> 20:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
Reportedly self-made, but appears to be a software screenshot – [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]])</sup> 20:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
==== [[:File:Holmessg.jpg]] ==== |
|||
same as above – [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]])</sup> 20:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:54, 14 April 2009
April 14
orphaned, if legit logo, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
orphaned, no source, appears to be official promotional shot Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
orphaned, given background appears to be an official photo Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
orphaned screenshot, uploader most likely not (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Tagged {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but no other information is given. This is a relatively low-resolution image with no metadata; there is no evidence that the uploader is indeed the creator of the image. The caption for this image in Jaani Peuhu identifies it as a "Peuhu Promo Pic", which seems to imply that it comes from a third-party source. —Bkell (talk) 12:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
"PAF" is not a source, it's a string of three letters. Need to have the proper source in order to verify the GFDL claim. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
recreated a deleted file: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3ASpokeo+logo.jpg Used only for a spammy article akaDruid (talk) 14:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
"PMA" is not a sufficient source to check GFDL status. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
"Official file photo" in the filename indicates that it is unlikely that the uploader holds the copyright as claimed in the license tag. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's a larger version of http://www.monroegop.com/i/stephen-minarik.jpg . Does one tag with Template:Db-g12 in this case? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 16:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure the uploader actually has permission from the publisher for it to be GFDL, but even then, it's not be used right now. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Reportedly self-made, but appears to be a software screenshot – Quadell (talk) 20:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
same as above – Quadell (talk) 20:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)